Minich L L, Tani L Y, Pagotto L T, Shaddy R E, Veasy L G
Department of Pediatrics, Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84113-1100, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 1997 Nov;20(11):924-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960201105.
The diagnosis of rheumatic fever is based on physical findings (major) and supporting laboratory evidence (minor) as defined by the Jones criteria. Rheumatic carditis is characterized by auscultation of a mitral regurgitant murmur. Doppler echocardiography, however, may detect mitral regurgitation when there is no murmur ("silent" mitral regurgitation), even in normal individuals.
The hypothesis of this study was that physiologic mitral regurgitation can be differentiated from pathologic "silent" mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography.
The study group consisted of 68 patients (2-27 years) with normal two-dimensional imaging and Doppler evidence of mitral regurgitation but no murmur. Patients with rheumatic fever (n = 37) met Jones criteria (chorea in 20, arthritis in 17). Patients without rheumatic fever (n = 31) were referred for innocent murmur (n = 7), abnormal electrocardiogram (n = 13), and chest pain (n = 11). Echoes were independently reviewed by two cardiologists blinded to the diagnosis. Pathologic mitral regurgitation was defined as meeting the following four criteria: (1) length of color jet > 1 cm, (2) color jet identified in at least two planes, (3) mosaic color jet, and (4) persistence of the jet throughout systole. Jet orientation was also noted.
Using the above criteria, there was agreement in echo interpretation of pathologic versus physiologic mitral regurgitation in 67 of 68 patients (interobserver variability of 1.5%). Pathologic regurgitation was found in 25 (68%) patients with rheumatic fever but in only 2 (6.5%) patients without rheumatic fever (p < 0.001). The specificity of Doppler for detecting pathologic regurgitation was 94% with a positive predictive value of 93%. The color mitral regurgitant jet was posteriorly directed in all 25 patients with rheumatic fever.
Pathologic "silent" mitral regurgitation of rheumatic fever can be distinguished from physiologic mitral regurgitation using strict Doppler criteria, particularly when the jet is directed posteriorly. These data support the use of Doppler echocardiography as a minor criterion for evaluating patients with suspected rheumatic fever.
风湿热的诊断基于琼斯标准所定义的体格检查结果(主要标准)和辅助实验室证据(次要标准)。风湿性心脏炎的特征是听诊发现二尖瓣反流杂音。然而,即使在正常人中,多普勒超声心动图也可能在没有杂音(“隐匿性”二尖瓣反流)时检测到二尖瓣反流。
本研究的假设是,通过多普勒超声心动图可以将生理性二尖瓣反流与病理性“隐匿性”二尖瓣反流区分开来。
研究组由68例患者(年龄2至27岁)组成,其二维成像正常且有多普勒证据显示二尖瓣反流但无杂音。患有风湿热的患者(n = 37)符合琼斯标准(20例有舞蹈病,17例有关节炎)。没有风湿热的患者(n = 31)因无害性杂音(n = 7)、心电图异常(n = 13)和胸痛(n = 11)而被转诊。两位对诊断不知情的心脏病专家独立审查超声心动图结果。病理性二尖瓣反流定义为符合以下四个标准:(1)彩色血流束长度> 1厘米,(2)在至少两个平面上识别出彩色血流束,(3)彩色血流束呈镶嵌状,(4)整个收缩期血流束持续存在。还记录了血流束方向。
使用上述标准,68例患者中有67例在病理性与生理性二尖瓣反流的超声心动图解释上达成一致(观察者间变异性为1.5%)。在患有风湿热的25例(68%)患者中发现病理性反流,但在没有风湿热的患者中仅2例(6.5%)发现病理性反流(p < 0.001)。多普勒检测病理性反流的特异性为94%,阳性预测值为93%。在所有25例风湿热患者中,二尖瓣反流彩色血流束均向后。
使用严格的多普勒标准可以将风湿热的病理性“隐匿性”二尖瓣反流与生理性二尖瓣反流区分开来,特别是当血流束向后时。这些数据支持将多普勒超声心动图作为评估疑似风湿热患者的次要标准。