Ferry J, Rankin L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Johns Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Aug;34(4):457-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1994.tb01270.x.
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety aspects of performing transcervical endometrial resection (T.C.R.E.) on a selected group of 278 patients with menstrual disorders under local analgesia (intracervical block) only. Patient acceptance of the procedure was high, with only 3 cases not completed due to insufficient analgesia (1.07%), although a further 9 (3.2%) were completed with the help of intravenous sedation. Patient satisfaction at 4 months was 90%. There were 4 perforations (1.4%), but no laparotomy was required. Five cases (1.7%) of haemorrhage required a Foley catheter, with 1 needing a transfusion. There was no case of clinically evident glycine overload. Twelve patients required an overnight stay. Patient acceptance of T.C.R.E. under local analgesia, and the incidence of major complications, compared favourably with other published series, including a series of 330 cases performed concurrently by the same operators under general anaesthesia.
本研究的目的是评估仅在局部镇痛(宫颈内阻滞)下对278例月经紊乱患者进行经宫颈子宫内膜切除术(T.C.R.E.)的疗效和安全性。患者对该手术的接受度很高,只有3例因镇痛不足未完成手术(1.07%),不过另有9例(3.2%)在静脉镇静的帮助下完成了手术。4个月时患者满意度为90%。有4例穿孔(1.4%),但无需开腹手术。5例(1.7%)出血患者需要留置 Foley 导管,其中1例需要输血。没有临床明显的甘氨酸过量病例。12例患者需要过夜留观。与其他已发表的系列研究相比,包括同一术者同期在全身麻醉下进行的330例手术系列,患者对局部镇痛下T.C.R.E.的接受度以及主要并发症的发生率更优。