• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于农业土壤中原生动物的笔记,重点是异养鞭毛虫和裸变形虫及其生态学。

Notes on protozoa in agricultural soil with emphasis on heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae and their ecology.

作者信息

Ekelund F, Rønn R

机构信息

Department of Population Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994 Dec;15(4):321-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00144.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00144.x
PMID:7848658
Abstract

Heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae are usually very numerous in agricultural soils; with numbers in the magnitude of 10,000 to 100,000 (active+encysted) cells per gram of soil. In 'hotspots' influenced by living roots or by dead organic material, the number may occasionally be as high as several millions per gram of soil. An exact enumeration of these organisms is virtually impossible. As they most often adhere closely to the soil particles, direct counting will underestimate numbers since the organisms will be masked. The method usually applied for enumeration of these organisms, the 'most probable number (MPN) method', is based on the ability of the organisms to grow on particular culture media. This method will in many cases underestimate the total protozoan number (active+encysted). It is uncertain how many of the heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae are actively moving and how many are encysted at a particular time; the 'HCl-method' which has usually been used to discriminate between active and encysted has proven to be highly unreliable. Despite the methodological difficulties many investigations of these organisms indicate that they play an important role in agricultural soils as bacterial consumers, and to a minor extent as consumers of fungi. Because of their small size and their flexible body they are able to graze bacteria in small pores in the soil in which larger organisms are precluded from coming. Key factors restricting the number and activity of heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae in soils seem to be water potential and soil structure and texture. In micro-cosm experiments, small heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae regulate the size and composition of the bacterial community. Bacterial activity seems to be stimulated by these organisms in most cases as well as the mineralization of carbon and nitrogen and possibly other mineral nutrients. In the rhizosphere of living plants the activity of protozoa has proven to stimulate uptake of nitrogen in pot experiments, and it has been hypothesized that organic matter liberated by plants in the root zone will stimulate bacterial and protozoan activity, leading to mineralization of organic soil nitrogen which is subsequently taken up by the plants.

摘要

异养鞭毛虫和裸变形虫在农业土壤中通常数量众多;每克土壤中的数量可达10000至100000个(活动态+包囊态)细胞。在受活根或死亡有机物质影响的“热点”区域,每克土壤中的数量偶尔可能高达数百万个。对这些生物进行精确计数几乎是不可能的。由于它们大多紧密附着在土壤颗粒上,直接计数会低估数量,因为这些生物会被掩盖。通常用于计数这些生物的方法,即“最大可能数(MPN)法”,是基于这些生物在特定培养基上生长的能力。在许多情况下,这种方法会低估原生动物的总数(活动态+包囊态)。不确定在特定时间有多少异养鞭毛虫和裸变形虫处于活动状态,有多少处于包囊状态;通常用于区分活动态和包囊态的“盐酸法”已被证明极不可靠。尽管存在方法上的困难,但对这些生物的许多研究表明,它们作为细菌消费者在农业土壤中发挥着重要作用,在较小程度上也作为真菌消费者。由于它们体型小且身体灵活,它们能够在土壤中的小孔中捕食细菌,而较大的生物无法进入这些小孔。限制土壤中异养鞭毛虫和裸变形虫数量及活动的关键因素似乎是水势以及土壤结构和质地。在微观实验中,小型异养鞭毛虫和裸变形虫会调节细菌群落的大小和组成。在大多数情况下,这些生物似乎会刺激细菌活动以及碳、氮和可能其他矿质养分的矿化。在活植物的根际,盆栽实验已证明原生动物的活动会刺激氮的吸收,并且有人推测植物在根区释放的有机物质会刺激细菌和原生动物的活动,导致有机土壤氮矿化,随后被植物吸收。

相似文献

1
Notes on protozoa in agricultural soil with emphasis on heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae and their ecology.关于农业土壤中原生动物的笔记,重点是异养鞭毛虫和裸变形虫及其生态学。
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994 Dec;15(4):321-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00144.x.
2
Estimating the growth potential of the soil protozoan community.估算土壤原生动物群落的生长潜力。
Protist. 2000 May;151(1):69-80. doi: 10.1078/1434-4610-00008.
3
Ecology of free-living amoebae.自由生活阿米巴的生态学
Crit Rev Microbiol. 1994;20(3):225-41. doi: 10.3109/10408419409114556.
4
Development and application of a most-probable-number-pcr assay to quantify flagellate populations in soil samples.一种用于定量土壤样品中鞭毛虫种群的最大可能数聚合酶链反应检测方法的开发与应用。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Apr;67(4):1613-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1613-1618.2001.
5
Structure and seasonal dynamics of the protozoan community (heterotrophic flagellates, ciliates, amoeboid protozoa) in the plankton of a large river (River Danube, Hungary).大型河流(匈牙利多瑙河)浮游生物中原生动物群落(异养鞭毛虫、纤毛虫、变形虫原生动物)的结构与季节动态
Eur J Protistol. 2009 May;45(2):121-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2008.08.002. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
6
Selective grazing of methanotrophs by protozoa in a rice field soil.稻田土壤中原生动物对甲烷氧化菌的选择性捕食。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Sep;65(3):408-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00511.x. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
7
High numbers of naked amoebae in the planktonic waters of a mangrove stand in southern Florida, USA.
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2000 May-Jun;47(3):235-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00042.x.
8
Soil microbial toxicity of eight polycyclic aromatic compounds: effects on nitrification, the genetic diversity of bacteria, and the total number of protozoans.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002 Aug;21(8):1644-50.
9
Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europeaus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth.欧洲野麦(禾本科)根际中的原生动物、线虫和蚯蚓:动物间相互作用、微生物响应及对植物生长的影响
Oecologia. 1996 Apr;106(1):111-126. doi: 10.1007/BF00334413.
10
Ecology of planktonic heterotrophic flagellates. A review.浮游异养鞭毛虫的生态学。综述。
Riv Biol. 2003 Jan-Apr;96(1):55-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary Decomposers Meet Their Predators: Decomposition Stage and Substrate Quality Jointly Structure Microbial Brown Food Webs During Fungal Necromass Decay.次级分解者遭遇其捕食者:在真菌坏死物质分解过程中,分解阶段和底物质量共同构建微生物棕色食物网。
Mol Ecol. 2025 Sep;34(18):e70060. doi: 10.1111/mec.70060. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
2
Discrepancies between prokaryotes and eukaryotes need to be considered in soil DNA-based studies.在基于土壤 DNA 的研究中,需要考虑原核生物和真核生物之间的差异。
Environ Microbiol. 2022 Sep;24(9):3829-3839. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16019. Epub 2022 Apr 24.
3
Heat Shock Response of the Active Microbiome From Perennial Cave Ice.
来自常年洞穴冰的活跃微生物群落的热休克反应
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 10;12:809076. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.809076. eCollection 2021.
4
Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited.原生动物与植物生长:重新审视土壤中的微生物环
New Phytol. 2004 Jun;162(3):617-631. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01066.x.
5
PA23 metabolites protect against protozoan grazing by the predator .PA23代谢产物可抵御捕食者对原生动物的捕食。
PeerJ. 2021 Jan 22;9:e10756. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10756. eCollection 2021.
6
Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Heterotrophic Protists (Cercozoa and Endomyxa) from Biological Soil Crusts.生物土壤结皮中异养原生生物(丝足虫类和内共生粘菌)的分类学和功能多样性
Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 20;9(2):205. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020205.
7
Protistan and fungal diversity in soils and freshwater lakes are substantially different.土壤和淡水湖泊中的原生生物和真菌多样性存在显著差异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 18;10(1):20025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77045-7.
8
The Ecology and Evolution of Amoeba-Bacterium Interactions.变形虫-细菌相互作用的生态与进化。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jan 4;87(2). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01866-20.
9
Total RNA sequencing reveals multilevel microbial community changes and functional responses to wood ash application in agricultural and forest soil.总 RNA 测序揭示了农业和森林土壤中施木灰导致的微生物群落多水平变化和功能响应。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Mar 1;96(3). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa016.
10
Soil ciliates of the Indian Delhi Region: Their community characteristics with emphasis on their ecological implications as sensitive bio-indicators for soil quality.印度德里地区的土壤纤毛虫:其群落特征,重点关注其作为土壤质量敏感生物指标的生态意义。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Sep;26(6):1305-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 17.