Sketris I S, Methot M E, Nicol D, Belitsky P, Knox M G
College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Nov;28(11):1227-31. doi: 10.1177/106002809402801101.
To determine the effect of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) on cyclosporine dose, clearance, and cost, and their effect on kidney graft function and survival in patients who underwent kidney transplant.
A total of 176 adults receiving 177 transplants were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified as follows: no CCB (n = 57), diltiazem (n = 13), nifedipine (n = 37), and verapamil (n = 70). Patients received cyclosporine 3-4 mg/kg by continuous infusion for 5 days followed by cyclosporine 10 mg/kg/d po to maintain initial whole blood concentrations of 300-400 ng/mL. Clearance of intravenously administered cyclosporine was calculated following at least 48 hours of the same dose by continuous infusion. The amount and cost of cyclosporine used during the first 10 days of oral therapy were also calculated.
Patients receiving diltiazem, but not verapamil or nifedipine, had decreased clearance of intravenously administered cyclosporine compared with that of the mean control group. The mean clearance of intravenously administered cyclosporine +/- SD in patients receiving no CCB was 5.1 +/- 1.5 mL/min/kg, diltiazem was 3.7 +/- 0.8 mL/min/kg, nifedipine was 6.4 +/- 1.9 mL/min/kg, and verapamil was 5.2 +/- 2.2 mL/min/kg. The amount and cost of 10 days of oral cyclosporine therapy was decreased in the verapamil group (5.7 +/- 1.5 g and $257 +/- 69) compared with that of the control group (6.7 +/- 1.6 g and $304 +/- 72) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference among the groups with respect to immediate graft function, 1-year serum creatinine concentration, or 1-year graft survival.
Diltiazem decreased the clearance of intravenously administered cyclosporine. Although verapamil did not decrease the clearance of intravenously administered cyclosporine, it allowed a significant reduction in oral cyclosporine cost without apparent adverse effects on graft function. Further work is needed to determine the effect of CCBs on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, especially with respect to their metabolism by gut and hepatic cytochrome P-450 enzymes, and their effect on patient outcome.
确定钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)对肾移植患者环孢素剂量、清除率及费用的影响,以及它们对肾移植功能和患者生存情况的影响。
对176例接受177次移植的成年人进行回顾性研究。患者分为以下几组:未使用CCB组(n = 57)、地尔硫䓬组(n = 13)、硝苯地平组(n = 37)和维拉帕米组(n = 70)。患者先以3 - 4 mg/kg的剂量持续静脉输注环孢素5天,随后口服环孢素10 mg/kg/d,以维持初始全血浓度在300 - 400 ng/mL。在至少48小时持续输注相同剂量后,计算静脉给予环孢素的清除率。还计算了口服治疗前10天使用的环孢素的量和费用。
与平均对照组相比,接受地尔硫䓬治疗的患者静脉给予环孢素的清除率降低,但维拉帕米和硝苯地平组未出现这种情况。未使用CCB的患者静脉给予环孢素的平均清除率±标准差为5.1±1.5 mL/min/kg,地尔硫䓬组为3.7±0.8 mL/min/kg,硝苯地平组为6.4±1.9 mL/min/kg,维拉帕米组为5.2±2.2 mL/min/kg。与对照组(6.7±1.6 g和304±72美元)相比,维拉帕米组口服环孢素治疗10天的量和费用降低(5.7±1.5 g和257±69美元)(p < 0.001)。在移植后即刻功能、1年血清肌酐浓度或1年移植肾存活率方面,各组之间无显著差异。
地尔硫䓬降低了静脉给予环孢素的清除率。虽然维拉帕米未降低静脉给予环孢素的清除率,但它能显著降低口服环孢素的费用,且对移植肾功能无明显不良影响。需要进一步研究来确定CCB对环孢素药代动力学的影响,特别是它们通过肠道和肝脏细胞色素P - 450酶的代谢情况,以及它们对患者预后的影响。