• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗技术设备——终究没那么危险?]

[Medical technical equipment--not so dangerous after all?].

作者信息

Skolbekken J A, Jystad A, Elvemo E

机构信息

SINTEF-Norsk institutt for sykehusforskning, Trondheim.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Jan 30;115(3):377-9.

PMID:7855841
Abstract

More than a decade has passed since the Ofstad committee presented its report on "Control of medical devices". The committee assumed that the use of medical devices constituted a major safety problem in the Norwegian health care system. The frequency of device-related injuries to patients was expected to be high, especially since the amount of non-recorded injuries was expected to be large. During the period since the publication of the report, several medical device reporting systems have been established, and special injury committees have been formed in some hospitals. Several "ombudsmen" for patients now exist, and both a patients' association and an insurance system for compensation to injured patients have been established. Despite this, we still do not know the total number of medical device-related injuries to patients in Norway. However, the existing records do show that device-related injuries to patients are not as abundant as the Ofstad committee feared.

摘要

自奥夫斯塔德委员会提交其关于“医疗设备控制”的报告以来,已经过去了十多年。该委员会认为,医疗设备的使用在挪威医疗保健系统中构成了一个重大安全问题。预计患者与设备相关的伤害发生率很高,尤其是因为预计未记录的伤害数量会很大。自该报告发表以来的这段时间里,已经建立了几个医疗设备报告系统,一些医院还成立了专门的伤害委员会。现在有几名患者“监察员”,并且已经建立了一个患者协会和一个为受伤患者提供赔偿的保险系统。尽管如此,我们仍然不知道挪威患者与医疗设备相关的伤害总数。然而,现有的记录确实表明,患者与设备相关的伤害并不像奥夫斯塔德委员会担心的那么多。

相似文献

1
[Medical technical equipment--not so dangerous after all?].[医疗技术设备——终究没那么危险?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Jan 30;115(3):377-9.
2
[What tasks should committees have for evaluating injuries to patients?].[委员会在评估患者损伤方面应承担哪些任务?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991 May 20;111(13):1651-3.
3
[The Norwegian Patient Insurance System. Documentation of patient information and use of medical experts in cases of injuries].[挪威患者保险系统。伤害案件中的患者信息记录及医学专家的使用情况]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Nov 20;117(28):4099-102.
4
[Fairness of compensations. Possibilities for patients injured in hospitals claim compensation].[赔偿的公正性。在医院受伤害患者索赔赔偿的可能性]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991 Mar 20;111(8):992-4.
5
[Compulsory reporting of accidents and injuries in somatic hospitals. Is the existing system adequate for quality assurance?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Oct 10;112(24):3095-9.
6
Safe Medical Devices Act: management guidance for hospital compliance with the new FDA requirements.《安全医疗器械法案》:医院遵守美国食品药品监督管理局新要求的管理指南
Hosp Technol Ser. 1993 Oct;12(11):1-27.
7
[Complaints to the Norwegian Patients' Society. Who complained, why and with what result?].[向挪威患者协会投诉。谁投诉了,为何投诉,结果如何?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Sep 30;109(27):2801-4.
8
[Medical equipment--old, of poor quality and hazardous?].[医疗设备——陈旧、质量差且有危害?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Jun 30;118(17):2646-8.
9
[Patients' experiences after complaining about health care].[患者投诉医疗服务后的经历]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Feb 10;112(4):509-12.
10
[Patients' complaints--many channels and poor oversight].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 May 30;110(14):1854-7.