• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸托槽与弓丝间摩擦力的研究

A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.

作者信息

Downing A, McCabe J, Gordon P

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, U.K.

出版信息

Br J Orthod. 1994 Nov;21(4):349-57. doi: 10.1179/bjo.21.4.349.

DOI:10.1179/bjo.21.4.349
PMID:7857894
Abstract

The differences in magnitude of static and kinetic frictional forces generated by 0.022 x 0.030-inch stainless steel (Dentaurum) and polycrystalline ceramic (Transcend) brackets in combination with archwires of different sizes (0.018 inch and 0.019 x 0.025 inch) and materials (stainless steel, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium) at a constant ligature force were investigated. A friction-testing assembly using the Instron machine was used. In all cases, the static frictional force was greater than the kinetic frictional force. There were no significant differences in the frictional forces generated by stainless steel and polycrystalline ceramic brackets. Beta-titanium archwires produced greater frictional forces than the other two materials. Increasing the archwire diameter increased the frictional force.

摘要

研究了0.022×0.030英寸的不锈钢(登泰克)和多晶陶瓷(超越)托槽与不同尺寸(0.018英寸和0.019×0.025英寸)及材料(不锈钢、镍钛合金和β钛合金)的弓丝在恒定结扎力下产生的静摩擦力和动摩擦力大小的差异。使用了一台采用英斯特朗机器的摩擦测试装置。在所有情况下,静摩擦力均大于动摩擦力。不锈钢和多晶陶瓷托槽产生的摩擦力无显著差异。β钛合金弓丝产生的摩擦力比其他两种材料更大。增大弓丝直径会增加摩擦力。

相似文献

1
A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.正畸托槽与弓丝间摩擦力的研究
Br J Orthod. 1994 Nov;21(4):349-57. doi: 10.1179/bjo.21.4.349.
2
The effect of artificial saliva on the frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.人工唾液对正畸托槽与弓丝间摩擦力的影响。
Br J Orthod. 1995 Feb;22(1):41-6. doi: 10.1179/bjo.22.1.41.
3
Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.烧结不锈钢托槽与正畸弓丝之间的相对动摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70153-2.
4
In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.弓丝与陶瓷托槽之间摩擦力的体外评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jan;125(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.005.
5
Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.评估传统及金属植入陶瓷托槽在各种托槽-弓丝组合中的摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00501-8.
6
Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.四种合金的陶瓷托槽与正畸钢丝之间摩擦力的评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Dec;98(6):499-506. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70015-5.
7
Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.不同托槽-弓丝组合的摩擦力
Aust Orthod J. 2004 May;20(1):25-30.
8
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.正畸托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦阻力:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015.
9
Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.评价不同合金陶瓷托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦力与金属托槽的差异。
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;24(1):40-5. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000100007.
10
An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.不同尺寸弓丝与传统不锈钢及自锁不锈钢托槽在多种托槽-弓丝组合方式下摩擦特性的体外评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):660-664. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Surface Roughness of Different Orthodontic Archwires: Atomic Force Microscopic Study.不同正畸弓丝表面粗糙度的比较:原子力显微镜研究
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51516. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51516. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.不同类型陶瓷托槽与不锈钢托槽搭配聚四氟乙烯涂层不锈钢丝和不锈钢弓丝之间摩擦阻力的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):e24161. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24161. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Frictional Forces Produced by Three Different Ligation Methods in Two Different Types of Brackets in 0.016 Nickel-Titanium Wire: An Study.
0.016英寸镍钛丝在两种不同类型托槽中三种不同结扎方法产生的摩擦力:一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1624-S1627. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_319_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Comparison of static friction and surface topography of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires: An in-vitro study.低摩擦与传统TMA正畸弓丝的静摩擦力及表面形貌比较:一项体外研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Jul;33(5):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.陶瓷注射成型(CIM)托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):262-71. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0030-8. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy.原子力显微镜评价正畸丝的表面粗糙度。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):922-8. doi: 10.2319/100211-620.1. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
7
The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics.滑动机制远移尖牙时托槽类型的临床和实验室影响。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):326-32. doi: 10.2319/032611-215.1. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
8
Effect of sodium bicarbonate air abrasive polishing on attrition and surface micromorphology of ceramic and stainless steel brackets.碳酸氢钠空气喷砂抛光对陶瓷和不锈钢托槽磨损和表面微观形貌的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):351-62. doi: 10.2319/040111-235.1. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
9
Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems.自锁托槽系统与传统托槽系统摩擦力的评估。
Eur J Dent. 2011 Jul;5(3):310-7.
10
Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva--an in vitro evaluation.不同牙弓丝托槽组合在人工唾液中的摩擦性能——体外评价。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):57-62. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000100012.