Suppr超能文献

吗啡与酮咯酸用于癌症术后患者静脉自控镇痛的比较

Comparison of morphine and ketorolac for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in postoperative cancer patients.

作者信息

Bosek V, Miguel R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 1994 Dec;10(4):314-8. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199412000-00012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of intravenous patient-controlled (i.v.-PCA) ketorolac to i.v.-PCA morphine in the treatment of postoperative pain in cancer patients.

DESIGN

In a double-blind, prospective, randomized trial, patients received either morphine in 1 mg/ml concentration or ketorolac 5 mg/ml for postoperative pain control. On arrival to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the patients received 2 ml of medication every 5 min, until satisfactory analgesia was achieved. If pain persisted after 20 ml of study drug had been administered, 0.1 mg/kg morphine was given i.m. On discharge from the PACU, the patients were placed on an i.v.-PCA pump. All patients received a basal infusion of 1 ml/h with a 1-ml on-demand bolus and a lockout interval of 10 min. Patients were offered 0.1 mg/kg morphine IM every 6 h, which they could refuse.

SETTING

University Cancer Center.

PATIENTS

Seventy patients scheduled for abdominal or truncal cancer operations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog pain scores (VAPS) and Visual analog sedation scores (VASS) were used to measure the quality of pain control achieved either with ketorolac or morphine. The incidence of side effects was documented.

RESULTS

The VAPS were comparable between the groups. Patients in the ketorolac group requested more supplemental i.m. morphine. However, the total morphine dose and incidence of side effects was significantly higher in patients receiving i.v.-PCA morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that ketorolac supplemented with small doses of morphine is associated with a lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus compared to morphine alone. This combination should be considered where immunosuppression from operation and administration of morphine is undesirable.

摘要

目的

比较静脉自控镇痛(i.v.-PCA)酮咯酸与i.v.-PCA吗啡治疗癌症患者术后疼痛的效果。

设计

在一项双盲、前瞻性、随机试验中,患者接受浓度为1mg/ml的吗啡或5mg/ml的酮咯酸用于术后疼痛控制。到达麻醉后护理单元(PACU)时,患者每5分钟接受2ml药物,直至达到满意的镇痛效果。如果在给予20ml研究药物后疼痛仍持续,则肌内注射0.1mg/kg吗啡。从PACU出院时,患者被置于静脉自控镇痛泵上。所有患者均接受1ml/h的基础输注,按需推注1ml,锁定间隔为10分钟。每6小时为患者提供一次0.1mg/kg的肌内注射吗啡,患者可以拒绝。

地点

大学癌症中心。

患者

70例计划进行腹部或躯干癌症手术的患者。

主要观察指标

使用视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAPS)和视觉模拟镇静评分(VASS)来衡量使用酮咯酸或吗啡实现的疼痛控制质量。记录副作用的发生率。

结果

两组之间的VAPS相当。酮咯酸组的患者需要更多的补充肌内注射吗啡。然而,接受静脉自控镇痛吗啡的患者的总吗啡剂量和副作用发生率明显更高。

结论

这些结果表明,与单独使用吗啡相比,补充小剂量吗啡的酮咯酸与恶心、呕吐和瘙痒的发生率较低相关。在手术和吗啡给药引起免疫抑制不可取的情况下,应考虑这种联合用药。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验