Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, Maeda K, Hozumi T, Nasu M, Shomura T
Department of Cardiology, Kobe General Hospital, Japan.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1;25(3):640-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00448-Y.
The purpose of this study was to assess flow dynamics and flow capacities of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery.
The postoperative flow capacity of internal mammary artery grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery has been reported to be restricted compared with that of saphenous vein grafts in studies using radionuclide angiography. A recently developed Doppler guide wire has been used to analyze the flow dynamics of bypass grafts and to clarify the mechanism of this limited flow capacity.
Phasic flow velocity recordings were obtained in the midportion of the bypass graft and within the native left anterior descending artery, using a 0.018-in. (0.046-cm) 12-MHz Doppler guide wire, in 53 patients: 27 patients with an internal mammary artery graft (16 with a new graft assessed 1 month postoperatively and 11 with an old graft assessed at 1 year) and 26 patients with a saphenous vein graft (13 with a new graft assessed 1 month postoperatively and 13 with an old graft assessed at 1 year). All patients were studied at baseline rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous infusion of dipyridamole, 0.56 mg/kg body weight, over 4 min.
In the left anterior descending artery itself, systolic and diastolic peak velocities, the time average of the instantaneous spectral peak velocity (time-averaged peak velocity), vessel diameter and the calculated flow volume did not differ significantly among the four graft groups. The time-averaged peak velocity was significantly greater for new than for old arterial grafts or for new or old vein grafts (mean +/- SD 27 +/- 9 vs. 19 +/- 6, 11 +/- 5 and 12 +/- 6 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.01). However, because the diameter of new arterial grafts was significantly smaller than that of the other three grafts (2.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.2 [p < 0.05], 3.6 +/- 0.6 [p < 0.01] and 3.4 +/- 0.5 mm [p < 0.01], respectively), there was no difference in calculated flow volumes at rest (62 +/- 17 vs. 58 +/- 15, 61 +/- 18 and 58 +/- 19 ml/min, respectively, p = NS) between new arterial grafts and the other grafts. Although the maximal time-averaged peak velocity during hyperemia was significantly greater in new than in old arterial grafts or new or old vein grafts (47 +/- 17 vs. 40 +/- 7, 31 +/- 8 and 34 +/- 12 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.01), the flow reserve of new arterial grafts was significantly smaller than that of the other three groups (1.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.3, 2.8 +/- 0.5 and 3.0 +/- 0.6, respectively, p < 0.01) because the baseline time-averaged peak velocity of these new grafts was far greater than that of the other groups.
Internal mammary artery graft flow early after operation is characterized by a higher rest velocity than that of vein graft flow. This high velocity maintains flow volume at baseline condition in compensation for the smaller diameter. Although flow reserve does not differ significantly between new and old vein grafts, that for internal mammary artery grafts is significantly reduced soon after bypass surgery. This restricted flow capacity improves late postoperatively because of an increase in diameter and a decrease in flow velocity from baseline levels.
本研究旨在评估乳内动脉和大隐静脉移植至左前降支冠状动脉的血流动力学及流量能力。
在使用放射性核素血管造影的研究中,已报道乳内动脉移植至左前降支冠状动脉的术后流量能力与大隐静脉移植相比受限。一种最近研发的多普勒导丝已被用于分析旁路移植血管的血流动力学,并阐明这种流量能力受限的机制。
使用一根0.018英寸(0.046厘米)12兆赫兹的多普勒导丝,在53例患者的旁路移植血管中部及左前降支冠状动脉自身内获取相位流速记录:27例接受乳内动脉移植的患者(16例术后1个月评估的新移植血管患者和11例术后1年评估的旧移植血管患者)以及26例接受大隐静脉移植的患者(13例术后1个月评估的新移植血管患者和13例术后1年评估的旧移植血管患者)。所有患者在静息基线状态以及静脉输注双嘧达莫(0.56毫克/千克体重,持续4分钟)诱发充血期间接受研究。
在左前降支冠状动脉自身内,四个移植血管组之间的收缩期和舒张期峰值流速、瞬时频谱峰值流速的时间平均值(时间平均峰值流速)、血管直径及计算出的流量并无显著差异。新动脉移植血管的时间平均峰值流速显著高于旧动脉移植血管或新、旧静脉移植血管(分别为平均±标准差:27±9与19±6、11±5和12±6厘米/秒,p<0.01)。然而,由于新动脉移植血管的直径显著小于其他三组移植血管(分别为2.4±0.1与2.9±0.2 [p<0.05]、3.6±0.6 [p<0.01]和3.4±0.5毫米 [p<0.01]),新动脉移植血管与其他移植血管在静息时的计算流量并无差异(分别为62±17与58±15、61±18和58±19毫升/分钟,p=无显著性差异)。尽管充血期间新动脉移植血管的最大时间平均峰值流速显著高于旧动脉移植血管或新、旧静脉移植血管(分别为47±17与40±7、31±8和34±12厘米/秒,p<0.01),但新动脉移植血管的血流储备显著小于其他三组(分别为1.8±0.3与2.6±0.3、2.8±0.5和3.0±0.6,p<0.01),因为这些新移植血管的基线时间平均峰值流速远高于其他组。
术后早期乳内动脉移植血管的血流特点是静息流速高于静脉移植血管。这种高流速在基线状态下维持流量以补偿较小的直径。尽管新、旧静脉移植血管之间的血流储备无显著差异,但旁路手术后乳内动脉移植血管的血流储备显著降低。这种受限的流量能力在术后晚期因直径增加和流速从基线水平下降而改善。