Gaita F, Haissaguerre M, Giustetto C, Fischer B, Riccardi R, Richiardi E, Scaglione M, Lamberti F, Warin J F
Cardiology Department, Ospedale Civile of Asti, Italy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1;25(3):648-54. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00455-Y.
This study evaluated accessory pathway location, its relation to retrograde P wave polarity on the surface electrocardiogram and radiofrequency ablation efficacy and safety in a large group of patients with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia.
Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia is an uncommon form of reciprocating tachycardia, almost incessant from infancy and usually refractory to drug therapy. It is characterized by RP > PR interval and usually by negative P waves in leads II, III, aVF and V4 to V6. Retrograde conduction occurs through an accessory pathway with slow and decremental properties. Although this accessory pathway has been classically located in the posteroseptal zone, other locations have been recently reported.
The study included 32 patients (20 men, 12 women, mean [+/- SD] age 29 +/- 15 years) with a diagnosis of permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia confirmed at electrophysiologic study. Seven patients had depressed left ventricular function. Radiofrequency energy was applied at the site of the earliest retrograde atrial activation during tachycardia.
There were 33 accessory pathways. The site of the earliest retrograde atrial activation was posteroseptal in 25 patients (76%), midseptal in 4 (12%), right posterior in 1 (3%), right lateral in 1 (3%), left posterior in 1 (3%) and left lateral in 1 (3%). Thirty pathways were ablated with a right approach; in 11 patients with posteroseptal pathway the ablation was performed through the coronary sinus. Three pathways were ablated with a left approach. Positive retrograde P wave in lead I suggested that ablation could be performed from the right side; if negative, it did not exclude ablation from this approach. All the accessory pathways were successfully ablated, with a median of 3 and a mean of 5.6 +/- 5 radiofrequency applications of 70 +/- 26 s in duration. In two patients with the accessory pathway in the midseptal zone, a transient second- and third-degree atrioventricular block, respectively, was observed after ablation. At a mean follow-up of 18 +/- 12 months, 31 patients (97%) are asymptomatic without antiarrhythmic therapy (95% confidence interval [CI] 84% to 99%). Recurrences were observed in four patients (13%) (95% CI 4% to 29%), three of whom had the accessory pathway ablated successfully at a second session. All patients with depressed left ventricular function showed a marked improvement after successful ablation.
In our experience, most of the patients with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia had posteroseptal pathways; all these pathways were ablated from the right side. P wave configuration may be helpful in suggesting the approach to the site of ablation. Catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy is an effective therapy for permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia.
本研究评估了一大组永久性交界性反复性心动过速患者的旁路位置、其与体表心电图上逆行P波极性的关系以及射频消融的疗效和安全性。
永久性交界性反复性心动过速是一种少见的反复性心动过速形式,自婴儿期起几乎持续发作,通常对药物治疗无效。其特征为RP间期大于PR间期,且在Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF及V4至V6导联中P波通常为负向。逆行传导通过具有缓慢递减特性的旁路进行。尽管该旁路传统上位于后间隔区,但最近有其他位置的报道。
本研究纳入了32例经电生理检查确诊为永久性交界性反复性心动过速的患者(20例男性,12例女性,平均[±标准差]年龄29±15岁)。7例患者左心室功能减退。在心动过速期间最早出现逆行心房激动的部位施加射频能量。
共有33条旁路。最早出现逆行心房激动的部位在后间隔的有25例患者(76%),中间隔的有4例(12%),右后侧壁的有1例(3%),右外侧壁的有1例(3%),左后侧壁的有1例(3%),左外侧壁的有1例(3%)。30条旁路通过右侧途径消融;11例后间隔旁路患者通过冠状窦进行消融。3条旁路通过左侧途径消融。Ⅰ导联逆行P波正向提示可从右侧进行消融;若为负向,则不排除从该途径消融。所有旁路均成功消融,射频应用次数中位数为3次,平均为5.6±5次,每次持续70±26秒。2例中间隔区旁路患者在消融后分别出现了短暂的二度和三度房室传导阻滞。平均随访18±12个月时,31例患者(97%)在未接受抗心律失常治疗的情况下无症状(95%置信区间[CI]84%至99%)。4例患者(13%)(95%CI 4%至29%)出现复发,其中3例在第二次手术时成功消融了旁路。所有左心室功能减退的患者在成功消融后均有明显改善。
根据我们的经验,大多数永久性交界性反复性心动过速患者有后间隔旁路;所有这些旁路均从右侧进行消融。P波形态可能有助于提示消融部位的途径。使用射频能量进行导管消融是治疗永久性交界性反复性心动过速的有效方法。