[Long term follow-up in patients with the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia treated with radiofrequency ablation].

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the long-term follow-up, safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia. We assessed the reversibility of tachycardia-related left ventricular dysfunction and we detailed the location and electrophysiologic characteristics of these atrioventricular decremental pathways.

BACKGROUND

Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia is an infrequent form on reciprocating tachycardia, commonly incessant and usually drug-refractory. The electrocardiographic hallmarks include an RP interval > PR with inverted P waves in leads II, III, aVF and V3-V6. During tachycardia, retrograde ventriculo-atrial conduction occurs over an accessory pathway with decremental conduction properties, located predominantly in the posteroseptal zone. It is known that long lasting and incessant tachycardia may result in tachycardia-related severe ventricular dysfunction, the so called tachycardiomyopathy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 24 patients (9 males, 15 females; mean age 42 +/- 22 years) with the diagnosis of permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia at electrophysiologic study. Six patients had tachycardia-related left ventricular dysfunction. Radiofrequency energy was delivered at the site of earliest retrograde atrial activation during reciprocating tachycardia (n = 22) or ventricular pacing (n = 2). All patients were followed at the outpatient clinic and serial echocardiograms were performed in those who presented depressed left ventricular function.

RESULTS

Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 24 decremental accessory pathways. Earliest retrograde atrial activation was right posteroseptal in 22 patients (92%), right midseptal in 1 (4%) and right posterolateral in 1 (4%). Twenty-three accessory pathways were successfully ablated with a mean of 5 +/- 3 (median, 4) radiofrequency applications of a mean duration of 48 +/- 13 s. Only the midseptal accessory pathway could not be ablated. After a mean follow-up of 21 +/- 16 months (median, 15; range 2 to 64) 22 patients remain asymptomatic. There were recurrences in 4 patients after the initial successful ablation (three during the first month and one during the second month after the procedure), two were ablated in a second ablation procedure, one patient required a third procedure and one required a fourth. All patients with left ventricular dysfunction experienced an improvement after ablation. Mean preablation left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with tachycardiomyopathy was 28 +/- 6% (median, 27) and raised to 51 +/- 16% (median, 47) after ablation (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the concept that radiofrequency catheter ablation is a safe and useful treatment for patients with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia. Radiofrequency current should be the treatment of choice in these patients because this arrhythmia is usually drug-refractory. The majority of accessory pathways with decremental conduction properties are localized in the posteroseptal zone. Cessation of the arrhythmia after successful ablation results in recovery of left ventricular dysfunction.