• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项州级优先法案通过后北卡罗来纳州地方吸烟法规的状况。

The status of local smoking regulations in North Carolina following a state preemption bill.

作者信息

Conlisk E, Siegel M, Lengerich E, Mac Kenzie W, Malek S, Eriksen M

机构信息

North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Adult Health Promotion, Raleigh 27611-7687.

出版信息

JAMA. 1995 Mar 8;273(10):805-7.

PMID:7861576
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the number and protectiveness of local smoking regulations adopted before the implementation of a preemptive statewide smoking control bill.

METHOD

Review of local smoking control regulations from all 100 counties and 85 municipalities with populations greater than 5000 in North Carolina.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adoption of local smoking control regulations before and during the 3-month delay in enactment of the preemptive bill. Protectiveness of regulations was based on restrictions on smoking and requirements for separate ventilation systems at private work sites: none (smoking unrestricted); minimal (smoking restricted to designated areas); partial (smoking restricted to designated areas served by separate ventilation systems); and complete (smoking prohibited). Because some regulations would be phased in gradually over the next 5 years, we evaluated the requirements that will be in effect by January 1, 2000.

RESULTS

Between July 15 and October 15, 1993, the number of local smoking regulations in North Carolina increased from 16 to 105. By the year 2000, 59% of private employees still will not be guaranteed any protection from work site environmental tobacco smoke; 19% will have minimal protection, 22% will have partial protection, and none will have complete protection.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-month delay in preemption created an unnatural time frame for communities to organize, debate, and adopt smoking restrictions. Despite the adoption of 89 new regulations, no private employees will be guaranteed complete protection from work site environmental tobacco smoke by the year 2000; new regulations can no longer be adopted. HB 957 has been a setback for public health in North Carolina.

摘要

目的

确定在全州范围实施先发制吸烟控制法案之前所采用的地方吸烟法规的数量及其保护作用。

方法

对北卡罗来纳州所有100个县以及85个人口超过5000的市镇的地方吸烟控制法规进行审查。

主要观察指标

在先发制法案颁布前3个月延迟期内及延迟期期间采用的地方吸烟控制法规。法规的保护作用基于对吸烟的限制以及对私人工作场所单独通风系统的要求:无(吸烟不受限制);最低限度(吸烟限制在指定区域);部分(吸烟限制在由单独通风系统服务的指定区域);完全(禁止吸烟)。由于一些法规将在未来5年内逐步实施,我们评估了到2000年1月1日将生效的要求。

结果

1993年7月15日至10月15日期间,北卡罗来纳州地方吸烟法规的数量从16条增加到105条。到2000年,仍有59%的私人雇员无法保证在工作场所免受环境烟草烟雾的侵害;19%将得到最低限度的保护,22%将得到部分保护,没有人将得到完全保护。

结论

先发制的3个月延迟为社区组织、辩论和通过吸烟限制措施创造了一个不自然的时间框架。尽管通过了89条新法规,但到2000年仍无法保证任何私人雇员在工作场所完全免受环境烟草烟雾的侵害;新法规已无法再通过。HB 957号法案对北卡罗来纳州的公共卫生而言是一次挫折。

相似文献

1
The status of local smoking regulations in North Carolina following a state preemption bill.一项州级优先法案通过后北卡罗来纳州地方吸烟法规的状况。
JAMA. 1995 Mar 8;273(10):805-7.
2
Assessment of local health department smoking policies--North Carolina, July-August 2003.2003年7 - 8月北卡罗来纳州地方卫生部门吸烟政策评估
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Jul 8;54(26):653-5.
3
Views about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies among North Carolina restaurant owners before passage of a law to prohibit smoking.在一项禁止吸烟的法律通过之前,北卡罗来纳州餐馆老板对二手烟和无烟政策的看法。
N C Med J. 2010 Jul-Aug;71(4):325-33.
4
Support for tobacco control policies among youth in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州青少年对烟草控制政策的支持情况。
N C Med J. 2006 May-Jun;67(3):175-9.
5
Tobacco control and prevention in Oklahoma: best practices in a preemptive state.俄克拉荷马州的烟草控制与预防:先发制人的州的最佳实践。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.001.
6
State preemption of local tobacco control policies restricting smoking, advertising, and youth access--United States, 2000-2010.州政府对限制吸烟、广告和青少年吸烟的地方烟草控制政策的优先干预——美国,2000-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Aug 26;60(33):1124-7.
7
State preemption of local smoke-free laws in government work sites, private work sites, and restaurants - United States, 2005-2009.州政府对工作场所(政府和私人)及餐馆无烟环境的规定进行先发制人-美国,2005-2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Feb 5;59(4):105-8.
8
Political realities of statewide smoking legislation: the passage of California's Assembly Bill 13.全州吸烟立法的政治现实:加利福尼亚州议会法案13的通过
Tob Control. 1997 Spring;6(1):41-54. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.1.41.
9
Evaluation of implementation, compliance and acceptance of partial smoking bans among hospitality workers before and after the Swiss Tobacco Control Act.瑞士烟草控制法案前后酒店工作人员对部分吸烟禁令的实施、遵守及接受情况评估
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Mar;37(1):89-96. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu021. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
10
Preemptive state tobacco-control laws--United States, 1982-1998.先发制人的州烟草控制法——美国,1982 - 1998年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 Jan 8;47(51-52):1112-4.

引用本文的文献

1
State Preemption Repeal: A Pathway to Broader Smoke-Free Indoor Air Policies in the U.S.州优先废除权:美国更广泛的室内无烟空气政策之路
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jun;68(6):1142-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.02.019. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
2
A Qualitative Study to Explore Perception of Impacts of Preemption of Tobacco Regulation on Counties in Appalachian Tennessee.一项探索田纳西州阿巴拉契亚地区各县对烟草监管前置影响认知的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093230.
3
Preemption in Tobacco Control: A Framework for Other Areas of Public Health.
烟草控制中的先发制人:公共卫生其他领域的框架。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):345-350. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305473. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
4
Local enactment of tobacco control policies in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州烟草控制政策的地方立法。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):941-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.941.
5
Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.作为制定室内空气清洁政策场所的卫生局。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257-65. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.257.
6
State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system.美国关于青少年获取烟草的州法律:用一种新的评级系统衡量其广泛性。
Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):345-52. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.345.
7
The defeat of Philip Morris' 'California Uniform Tobacco Control Act'.菲利普·莫里斯公司的《加利福尼亚统一烟草控制法案》受挫。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):1989-96. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.1989.