• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system.美国关于青少年获取烟草的州法律:用一种新的评级系统衡量其广泛性。
Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):345-52. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.345.
2
Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA).评分系统在美国各州室内空气清洁法中的应用。
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):26-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.26.
3
State preemption of local tobacco control policies restricting smoking, advertising, and youth access--United States, 2000-2010.州政府对限制吸烟、广告和青少年吸烟的地方烟草控制政策的优先干预——美国,2000-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Aug 26;60(33):1124-7.
4
State laws on tobacco control--United States, 1998.1998年美国关于烟草控制的州法律
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1999 Jun 25;48(3):21-40.
5
State youth-access tobacco control policies and youth smoking behavior in the United States.美国的州级青少年控烟政策与青少年吸烟行为
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Oct;19(3):180-7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00196-3.
6
State laws on tobacco control--United States, 1995.1995年美国关于烟草控制的州法律
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1995 Nov 3;44(6):1-28.
7
Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem.烟草控制中的优先事项。对一个新出现的公共卫生问题的综述。
JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858.
8
Preemptive state tobacco-control laws--United States, 1982-1998.先发制人的州烟草控制法——美国,1982 - 1998年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 Jan 8;47(51-52):1112-4.
9
Tobacco possession, use, and purchase laws and penalties in Minnesota: enforcement, tobacco diversion programs, and youth awareness.明尼苏达州的烟草持有、使用和购买法律及处罚:执法、烟草转移计划和青少年认知
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Jan;9 Suppl 1:S57-64. doi: 10.1080/14622200601083475.
10
Oklahoma tobacco policy-making.俄克拉何马州的烟草政策制定。
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2005 Mar;98(3):89-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Preemption in Tobacco Control: A Framework for Other Areas of Public Health.烟草控制中的先发制人:公共卫生其他领域的框架。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):345-350. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305473. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
2
Policies that limit youth access and exposure to tobacco: a scientific neglect of the first stages of the policy process.限制青少年获取和接触烟草的政策:政策过程初期的科学忽视。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7073-x.
3
Multiple Levels of Influence That Impact Youth Tobacco Use.影响青少年烟草使用的多层次因素。
Tob Regul Sci. 2016 Apr;2(2):106-122. doi: 10.18001/TRS.2.2.2.
4
Enforcement Provisions of Indoor Tanning Bans for Minors: An Analysis of the First 6 US States.未成年人室内晒黑禁令的执行规定:对美国前六个州的分析
Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):e10-2. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302684. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
Variations in state use of antitobacco message themes predict youth smoking prevalence in the USA, 1999-2005.1999 - 2005年美国各州反烟草信息主题的使用差异预测青少年吸烟率
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):101-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051836. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
6
Rating the effectiveness of local tobacco policies for reducing youth smoking.评估地方烟草政策在减少青少年吸烟方面的有效性。
J Prim Prev. 2014 Apr;35(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0336-x.
7
Long-term effects of laws governing youth access to tobacco.限制青少年接触烟草法律的长期影响。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Aug;103(8):1493-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301123. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
8
State-level tobacco control policies and youth smoking cessation measures.国家层面的烟草控制政策与青少年戒烟措施。
Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 18.
9
Tobacco control policy and adolescent cigarette smoking status in the United States.美国的烟草控制政策与青少年吸烟状况
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Jul;11(7):875-85. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp081. Epub 2009 May 14.
10
A comprehensive review of state laws governing Internet and other delivery sales of cigarettes in the United States.对美国管辖香烟互联网销售及其他送货上门销售的州法律的全面审查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Feb;10(2):253-65. doi: 10.1080/14622200701838232.

本文引用的文献

1
Public health approaches to tobacco use prevention and cessation in the U.S.美国预防和戒烟的公共卫生方法
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996 Spring;2(2):17-26.
2
The effect of enforcing tobacco-sales laws on adolescents' access to tobacco and smoking behavior.执行烟草销售法律对青少年获取烟草及吸烟行为的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 9;337(15):1044-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710093371505.
3
Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem.烟草控制中的优先事项。对一个新出现的公共卫生问题的综述。
JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858.
4
The ledger of tobacco control: Is the cup half empty or half full?烟草控制的账本:杯子是半空还是半满?
JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1281-4.
5
Epidemiology of tobacco use and dependence.烟草使用与依赖的流行病学
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(1):48-65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036185.
6
The problem and sociocultural context of single-cigarette sales.单支香烟销售的问题及社会文化背景。
JAMA. 1994 Feb 23;271(8):618-20.
7
The illegal sale of cigarettes to US minors: estimates by state.向美国未成年人非法销售香烟:各州的估计情况。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Feb;84(2):300-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.2.300.
8
The politics of antismoking legislation.反吸烟立法的政治因素
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Winter;18(4):787-819.
9
The status of local smoking regulations in North Carolina following a state preemption bill.一项州级优先法案通过后北卡罗来纳州地方吸烟法规的状况。
JAMA. 1995 Mar 8;273(10):805-7.
10
Nicotine addiction in young people.年轻人的尼古丁成瘾问题。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jul 20;333(3):186-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199507203330311.

美国关于青少年获取烟草的州法律:用一种新的评级系统衡量其广泛性。

State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system.

作者信息

Alciati M H, Frosh M, Green S B, Brownson R C, Fisher P H, Hobart R, Roman A, Sciandra R C, Shelton D M

机构信息

Management Solutions for Health, Reston, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):345-52. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.345.

DOI:10.1136/tc.7.4.345
PMID:10093166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1751463/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and implement a rating system evaluating the extensiveness of state laws restricting youth access to tobacco.

DESIGN

State laws on youth access to tobacco were analysed and assigned ratings on nine items. Six items addressed specific tobacco-control provisions, and three related to enforcement provisions. For each item, a target was specified reflecting public health objectives. Achieving the target resulted in a rating of +4 points; for three items, a rating of +5 was possible if the target was exceeded. Criteria for lower ratings were established for situations when the target was not met.

SETTING

United States.

RESULTS

State scores (sum of the ratings across all nine items) ranged from 0-18 in 1993, 2-21 in 1994, and 1-21 in 1995 and 1996, out of a possible total of 39. The average score across states was 7.2 in 1993, 7.9 in 1994, 8.2 in 1995, and 9.0 in 1996. The overall mean rating (per item) was 0.80 in 1993, 0.88 in 1994, 0.91 in 1995, and 1.00 in 1996, on a scale where 4.0 indicates that the target goals (per item) were met. From 1993 to 1996, scores increased for 20 states, decreased for one state, and remained unchanged for the others. The number of states for which state preemption of local tobacco regulation was a factor doubled from 10 states in 1993 to 20 states in 1996.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all states have laws addressing youth access to tobacco, this analysis reveals that, as of the end of 1996, the progress towards meeting health policy targets is slow, and state legislation that preempts local tobacco regulation is becoming more common.

摘要

目的

制定并实施一项评估各州限制青少年获取烟草相关法律全面性的评级系统。

设计

对各州关于青少年获取烟草的法律进行分析,并就九个项目进行评级。六个项目涉及具体的烟草控制条款,三个项目与执法条款相关。对于每个项目,都设定了一个反映公共卫生目标的指标。达到该指标可得 +4 分;对于三个项目,如果超过指标则可得 +5 分。当未达到指标时,为较低评级设定了标准。

背景

美国。

结果

1993 年各州得分(所有九个项目评级之和)在 0 - 18 分之间,1994 年为 2 - 21 分,1995 年和 1996 年为 1 - 21 分,满分可能为 39 分。1993 年各州平均得分为 7.2 分,1994 年为 7.9 分,1995 年为 8.2 分,1996 年为 9.0 分。1993 年总体平均评级(每项)为 0.80,1994 年为 0.88,1995 年为 0.91,1996 年为 1.00,该评级量表中 4.0 表示(每项)达到目标。从 1993 年到 1996 年,20 个州得分上升,1 个州得分下降,其他州得分不变。州法律优先于地方法规的州数量从 1993 年的 10 个增加一倍至 1996 年的 20 个。

结论

尽管所有州都有关于青少年获取烟草的法律,但该分析表明,截至 1996 年底,在实现卫生政策目标方面进展缓慢,且优先于地方法规的州立法正变得更加普遍。