Steinschneider A, Santos V, Freed G
American Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Institute, Atlanta, GA 30328.
Pediatrics. 1995 Mar;95(3):378-80.
To evaluate the financial impact of incorporating event recordings as an integral component of home apnea/bradycardia monitoring.
This theoretical analysis examines the cost of home monitoring when medical decisions are based on an evaluation of the cardiorespiratory waveforms surrounding each apnea/bradycardia monitor alarm (documented monitoring) compared to those based on parental observations. Data for both approaches were obtained from 155 infants referred within the first 10 days of life, because a sibling died of sudden infant death syndrome. All were followed on an impedance type apnea/bradycardia monitor with an attached event recorder. The monitor settings were 20 seconds for apnea and 80 beats per minute (bpm) for bradycardia. Parents were taught how to use the equipment, resuscitative techniques, and to complete an alarm log. The clinical protocol provided for home monitoring until there were no "episodes" (prolonged apnea or prolonged bradycardia) for 16 consecutive weeks. A polysomnogram would be obtained if an "episode" occurred. For each infant two independent approaches were used to judge the occurrence of an "episode": (1) parental report of an apnea alarm occurring during sleep or a physiologic alarm associated with skin color change or resuscitative intervention and (2) apnea > or = 20 seconds long or bradycardia > or = 10 seconds. The cost was calculated assuming a 4-week monitor rental fee of $350, a 4-week waveform interpretation fee of $180, and a $600 fee for performing and interpreting a polysomnogram.
Episodes defined from an interpretation of the cardiorespiratory waveforms resulted in fewer diagnostic studies, a shorter period of home monitoring, and lower per patient treatment costs.
Despite the increased monthly cost, incorporating event recordings as an integral component of home monitoring resulted in a lower average per patient cost.
评估将事件记录作为家庭呼吸暂停/心动过缓监测的一个组成部分所产生的财务影响。
本理论分析考察了在医疗决策基于对每次呼吸暂停/心动过缓监测警报(记录监测)周围心肺波形的评估时与基于家长观察时相比的家庭监测成本。两种方法的数据均来自155名在出生后10天内转诊的婴儿,因为其兄弟姐妹死于婴儿猝死综合征。所有婴儿均使用带有事件记录器的阻抗式呼吸暂停/心动过缓监测仪进行监测。监测仪设置为呼吸暂停20秒,心动过缓80次/分钟(bpm)。教家长如何使用设备、复苏技术以及填写警报日志。临床方案规定进行家庭监测,直到连续16周没有“发作”(长时间呼吸暂停或长时间心动过缓)。如果发生“发作”,则进行多导睡眠图检查。对于每个婴儿,使用两种独立方法判断“发作”的发生情况:(1)家长报告睡眠期间发生呼吸暂停警报或与肤色变化或复苏干预相关的生理警报;(2)呼吸暂停≥20秒或心动过缓≥10秒。成本计算假设监测仪4周租金为350美元,4周波形解读费为180美元,进行和解读多导睡眠图检查费用为600美元。
根据心肺波形解读定义的发作导致诊断性检查减少、家庭监测时间缩短以及每位患者的治疗成本降低。
尽管每月成本增加,但将事件记录作为家庭监测的一个组成部分导致每位患者的平均成本降低。