A role for D2, but not D1, dopamine receptors in the response-reinstating effects of food reinforcement.

Although the reinforcing properties of food are reduced in the presence of dopamine antagonist drugs, controversy exists about the relative roles of D1 vs D2 receptor subtypes in the actions of these drugs. The current experiment compared the effects of raclopride (a selective D2 receptor antagonist) and SCH 39166 (a selective D1 receptor antagonist) in the response-reinstating effects of food reinforcement. Hungry rats were trained to run a straight-alley for food reinforcement during single daily trials. The operant was then extinguished during consecutive daily non-reinforced trials. Subjects were then injected with one of four doses of raclopride (0.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) or SCH 39166 (0.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.1 mg/kg i.p.) 30 min prior to a single reinforced treatment trial. Twenty-four h later, a test trial was conducted in an unbaited runway. The single reinforced trial in the midst of extinction was observed to reinstate operant runway performance. Raclopride, but not SCH 39166, dose-dependently attenuated this reinstatement. Motor control groups ruled out the possibility that these results were due to differential residual motor effects of the drugs. Results suggest that D2, but not D1, dopamine receptors, are involved in the response-reinstating properties of food reinforcement.