Suppr超能文献

腰椎板切除术后的镇痛:硬膜外输注芬太尼与患者自控静脉注射吗啡的比较

Postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy: epidural fentanyl infusion versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine.

作者信息

Joshi G P, McCarroll S M, O'Rourke K

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1995 Mar;80(3):511-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199503000-00013.

Abstract

We compared the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural fentanyl infusion with intravenous morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia system (IV-PCA) in the management of postoperative pain after lumbar laminectomy. Twenty patients undergoing elective lumbar laminectomy were randomly allocated to one of two groups. The epidural group (n = 10) received an epidural fentanyl infusion (2 micrograms/mL at 4-10 mL/h) while the IV-PCA group (n = 10) received IV morphine through a PCA system. The general anesthetic technique was standardized. Visual analog pain scores were recorded at 12, 24, and 48 h after the operation. The amount of morphine (or its equivalent in fentanyl) used over the 48-h postoperative period was documented. The postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group than in the IV-PCA group throughout the study period. The total consumption of morphine (or its fentanyl equivalent) over the 48-h period was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the epidural group compared to the IV-PCA group. Although more patients in the IV-PCA group required urinary catheterization and had somnolence than the epidural group, there was no difference in the incidence of vomiting or pruritus. No patient developed respiratory depression or wound infection. We conclude that continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl is superior to IV-PCA morphine in the management of pain after lumbar laminectomy.

摘要

我们比较了在腰椎板切除术后疼痛管理中,通过患者自控镇痛系统(静脉自控镇痛,IV-PCA)持续硬膜外输注芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡的疗效和安全性。20例行择期腰椎板切除术的患者被随机分为两组。硬膜外组(n = 10)接受硬膜外芬太尼输注(4 - 10 mL/h,浓度为2微克/毫升),而静脉自控镇痛组(n = 10)通过PCA系统接受静脉注射吗啡。全身麻醉技术标准化。术后12、24和48小时记录视觉模拟疼痛评分。记录术后48小时内使用的吗啡量(或其芬太尼等效量)。在整个研究期间,硬膜外组的术后疼痛评分显著低于静脉自控镇痛组。与静脉自控镇痛组相比,硬膜外组术后48小时内吗啡(或其芬太尼等效量)的总消耗量显著更低(P < 0.001)。虽然静脉自控镇痛组比硬膜外组有更多患者需要导尿且出现嗜睡,但呕吐或瘙痒的发生率没有差异。没有患者发生呼吸抑制或伤口感染。我们得出结论,在腰椎板切除术后的疼痛管理中,持续硬膜外输注芬太尼优于静脉自控镇痛吗啡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验