Senf J H, Campos-Outcalt D
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson 85719.
Acad Med. 1995 Feb;70(2):142-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199502000-00019.
The effect of a required six-week third-year family medicine clerkship was examined within a framework of professional socialization. Socialization was considered to consist of an institutional process, i.e., value indoctrination, and a learner process, i.e., value clarification.
Pre- and postclerkship data from 1,095 students (classes of 1981-1993) at the University of Arizona College of Medicine were analyzed. In addition, specialty match data were obtained. Factor analysis of 19 items on the pre- and postclerkship questionnaires was used to derive four scales measuring attitudes related to family medicine. The students were first grouped into four groups: those who preferred family medicine before and after the clerkship, those who preferred other specialties both times, those who switched to family medicine, and those who switched away from family medicine. Then the students were grouped into eight groups by dividing each of the specialty-preference groups into two sections: those who matched to family medicine and those who did not. Statistical comparisons involved the use of the t and F statistics.
Usable data were available for a maximum of 997 students (91%). The students' attitudes about family medicine changed during the clerkship to become more consistent with their postclerkship specialty preferences. In addition, more students preferred family medicine after the clerkship than before it. When each group was further divided into those matching and not matching into family medicine, no significant difference in attitudes was found between those matching and those not matching.
These results reflect both a value clarification process and a value indoctrination effect. The discrepancy between postclerkship specialty preferences and later match data indicates that the indoctrination effect and clarification process continue into the fourth year.
在专业社会化框架内考察了为期六周的三年级家庭医学实习的效果。社会化被认为包括一个机构过程,即价值观灌输,以及一个学习者过程,即价值观澄清。
对亚利桑那大学医学院1095名学生(1981 - 1993级)实习前后的数据进行了分析。此外,还获取了专业匹配数据。对实习前后问卷上的19个项目进行因子分析,以得出四个衡量与家庭医学相关态度的量表。学生首先被分为四组:实习前后都偏好家庭医学的学生、两次都偏好其他专业的学生、转而选择家庭医学的学生以及不再选择家庭医学的学生。然后,通过将每个专业偏好组再分为两个部分:与家庭医学匹配的学生和不匹配的学生,将学生分为八组。统计比较使用了t统计量和F统计量。
最多有997名学生(91%)有可用数据。学生对家庭医学的态度在实习期间发生了变化,变得更符合他们实习后的专业偏好。此外,实习后比实习前有更多学生偏好家庭医学。当将每组进一步分为与家庭医学匹配和不匹配的学生时,匹配和不匹配的学生在态度上没有发现显著差异。
这些结果既反映了价值观澄清过程,也反映了价值观灌输效应。实习后专业偏好与后期匹配数据之间的差异表明,灌输效应和澄清过程持续到了第四年。