Shue G, Crago P E, Chizeck H J
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995 Feb;42(2):212-23. doi: 10.1109/10.341834.
Muscle input/output models incorporating activation dynamics, moment-angle, and moment-velocity factors are commonly used to predict the moment produced by muscle during nonisometric contractions; the three factors are generally assumed to be independent. We examined the ability of models with independent factors, as well as models with coupled factors, to fit input/output data measured during simultaneous modulation of the fraction of muscle stimulated (recruitment) and joint angle inputs. The models were evaluated in stimulated cat soleus muscles producing ankle extension moment, with regard to their potential applications in neuroprostheses with either fixed parameters or parameter adaptation. Both uncoupled and coupled models predicted the output moment well for random angle perturbation sizes ranging from 10 degrees to 30 degrees. For the uncoupled model, the best parameter values depended on the range of perturbations and the mean angle. Introducing coupling between activation and velocity in the model reduced this parameter sensitivity; one set of model parameter values fit the data for all perturbation sizes and also fit the data under isometric or constant stimulation conditions. Thus, the coupled model would be the most appropriate for applications requiring fixed parameter values. In contrast, with continuous parameter adaptation, errors due to changing test conditions decreased more quickly for the uncoupled model, suggesting that it would perform well in adaptive control of neuroprostheses.
包含激活动力学、力矩-角度和力矩-速度因素的肌肉输入/输出模型通常用于预测非等长收缩期间肌肉产生的力矩;一般认为这三个因素是相互独立的。我们研究了具有独立因素的模型以及具有耦合因素的模型对在同时调节受刺激肌肉比例(募集)和关节角度输入时测量的输入/输出数据的拟合能力。这些模型在产生踝关节伸展力矩的受刺激猫比目鱼肌中进行了评估,考虑了它们在具有固定参数或参数自适应的神经假体中的潜在应用。对于10度到30度范围内的随机角度扰动大小,非耦合模型和耦合模型都能很好地预测输出力矩。对于非耦合模型,最佳参数值取决于扰动范围和平均角度。在模型中引入激活和速度之间的耦合降低了这种参数敏感性;一组模型参数值适合所有扰动大小的数据,也适合等长或恒定刺激条件下的数据。因此,耦合模型最适合需要固定参数值的应用。相比之下,在连续参数自适应的情况下,非耦合模型因测试条件变化而产生的误差下降得更快,这表明它在神经假体的自适应控制中表现良好。