Phillips G D, Howes S R, Whitelaw R B, Robbins T W, Everitt B J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jul;115(3):419-29. doi: 10.1007/BF02245085.
Male Lister hooded rats were raised from weaning either alone (isolation reared) or in groups of five (socially reared controls). At 5 months of age, bilateral guide cannulae were implanted within the nucleus accumbens, and experiments began. The effect of isolation rearing upon the reinforcing efficacy of the intravenous self-administration of cocaine (experiment 1), or the bilateral intra-accumbens self-administration of d-amphetamine (experiment 2) was assessed. Self-administration was made contingent upon the acquisition of a novel lever-pressing response. Two identical levers were available within each operant chamber. Responding on one lever resulted in the delivery of drug (experiment 1: cocaine, 1.5 mg/kg per infusion; experiment 2: d-amphetamine, 0.25 micrograms/side), responding on the second, control lever was recorded but had no programmed consequences. Animals were not "primed" with noncontingent infusions at any time. For experiment 1, animals received intra-accumbens infusions of the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH-23390, or the D2 dopamine receptor antagonist sulpiride over two test sessions. Within each session, animals received a cumulative series of doses of each dopamine receptor antagonist. A validation group received doses of each antagonist according to more conventional methods (one dose per session). In either case, intra-accumbens infusions of SCH-23390 or sulpiride enhanced the rate of the self-administration of cocaine in socially reared controls. However, isolation rearing impaired this response to intra-accumbens infusions of the dopamine receptor antagonists. Experiment 2a examined the acquisition of the intra-accumbens self-administration of d-amphetamine. Socially reared controls acquired readily a selective response upon the drug lever. However, isolation reared animals acquired a selective response at a greatly retarded rate. In experiment 2b, a full d-amphetamine dose-response function was examined. Isolation rearing impaired the response to a range of doses of d-amphetamine. In experiment 2c, the infusate (1 microgram d-amphetamine per infusion) was adulterated with either SCH-23390 or sulpiride. Adulteration with either dopamine receptor antagonist enhanced the rate of response by socially reared controls. Isolation rearing impaired this response to SCH-23390, and blocked the response to sulpiride. These data are discussed in relation to the functioning of cortico-limbic-striatal systems, with particular reference to the mesoaccumbens dopamine projection.
雄性利斯特戴帽大鼠从断奶起就单独饲养(隔离饲养)或五只一组饲养(群居饲养作为对照)。在5个月大时,将双侧引导套管植入伏隔核,然后开始实验。评估了隔离饲养对静脉注射可卡因自我给药强化效果的影响(实验1),以及对双侧伏隔核注射d-苯丙胺自我给药强化效果的影响(实验2)。自我给药取决于获得一种新的压杆反应。每个操作箱内有两个相同的杠杆。按压一个杠杆会导致药物递送(实验1:可卡因,每次输注1.5毫克/千克;实验2:d-苯丙胺,每侧0.25微克),记录按压第二个对照杠杆的情况,但没有设定相应结果。动物在任何时候都没有接受非条件输注的“激发”。在实验1中,动物在两个测试阶段接受伏隔核内注射D1多巴胺受体拮抗剂SCH-23390或D2多巴胺受体拮抗剂舒必利。在每个阶段内,动物接受一系列递增剂量的每种多巴胺受体拮抗剂。一个验证组按照更传统的方法接受每种拮抗剂的剂量(每个阶段一剂)。在任何一种情况下,伏隔核内注射SCH-23390或舒必利都会提高群居饲养对照大鼠可卡因自我给药的速率。然而,隔离饲养削弱了对伏隔核内注射多巴胺受体拮抗剂的这种反应。实验2a研究了伏隔核内注射d-苯丙胺自我给药的习得情况。群居饲养的对照大鼠很容易在药物杠杆上获得选择性反应。然而,隔离饲养的动物获得选择性反应的速度大大延迟。在实验2b中,研究了完整的d-苯丙胺剂量反应函数。隔离饲养削弱了对一系列d-苯丙胺剂量的反应。在实验2c中,输注液(每次输注1微克d-苯丙胺)与SCH-23390或舒必利混合。与任何一种多巴胺受体拮抗剂混合都会提高群居饲养对照大鼠的反应速率。隔离饲养削弱了对SCH-23390的这种反应,并阻断了对舒必利的反应。这些数据结合皮质-边缘-纹状体系统的功能进行了讨论,特别提及了中脑伏隔核多巴胺投射。