O'Neill T W, Varlow J, Felsenberg D, Johnell O, Weber K, Marchant F, Delmas P D, Cooper C, Kanis J, Silman A J
ARC Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, England.
J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Dec;9(12):1895-907. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650091209.
Vertebral height ratios are used to define vertebral deformity in clinical and epidemiologic studies of vertebral osteoporosis. However, few data have been obtained on the variation in these ratios in different populations using standard methods. We examined vertebral morphometric measurements obtained in a population survey from three centers: Malmö (Sweden), Montceau-les-Mines (France), and Graz (Austria), to study the influence of sex and the population center on vertebral height ratios. Radiographs were obtained according to a standardized protocol, and morphometric measurements, anterior height Ha, central height Hc, and posterior height Hp, made in Berlin. The height ratios anterior, Ha/Hp, central, Hc/Hp, posterior I, Hp/Hp', and posterior II, Hp/Hp" (Hp' = posterior height of vertebrae above, Hp" = posterior height of vertebrae below) were calculated for each vertebra from T4 to L4. The mean and standard deviation of these ratios for each sex and each center were derived using a statistical trimming procedure to normalize the distribution. Threshold values for defining grade 1 and grade 2 deformities, wedge, biconcavity, and compression, were calculated using these parameters. Anterior and central vertebral height ratios were smaller in males than females (p < 0.01). There were significant differences between the three centers (p < 0.01) both in the trimmed mean values for anterior and central vertebral height ratios and in the thresholds derived using standard criteria for defining wedge and biconcavity deformity. The data confirm the impression from single-center studies that vertebral height ratios vary between populations and suggest that reference values for vertebral height ratios should be derived separately for males and females within individual populations whenever possible.
在椎体骨质疏松症的临床和流行病学研究中,椎体高度比用于定义椎体畸形。然而,使用标准方法获得的不同人群中这些比值变化的数据很少。我们检查了在来自三个中心的人群调查中获得的椎体形态测量数据:瑞典的马尔默、法国的蒙索莱米讷和奥地利的格拉茨,以研究性别和人群中心对椎体高度比的影响。根据标准化方案获取X线片,并在柏林进行形态测量,包括前高度Ha、中心高度Hc和后高度Hp。计算从T4到L4每个椎体的前、Ha/Hp、中心、Hc/Hp、后I、Hp/Hp'和后II、Hp/Hp''(Hp' = 上方椎体的后高度,Hp'' = 下方椎体的后高度)的高度比。使用统计修剪程序对这些比值的分布进行归一化,得出每个性别和每个中心的这些比值的平均值和标准差。使用这些参数计算定义1级和2级畸形、楔形变、双凹形变和压缩形变的阈值。男性的前椎体高度比和中心椎体高度比均小于女性(p < 0.01)。三个中心在前椎体高度比和中心椎体高度比的修剪平均值以及使用定义楔形变和双凹形变的标准标准得出的阈值方面均存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。这些数据证实了单中心研究的印象,即不同人群之间椎体高度比存在差异,并表明只要有可能,应在个体人群中分别得出男性和女性的椎体高度比参考值。