Tang K C
Southern Sydney Health Promotion Unit, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Chin Med. 1994;22(3-4):235-42. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X94000292.
Qigong has become increasingly popular as a modality in traditional Chinese medical care. It may be effective in treating diseases. However, it is not uncommon to hear complaints about the ineffectiveness of such treatment. This paper attempts to look at the recent promotion of Qigong as an effective form of health care and the regulation of Qigong practitioners in China by a review of literature and interviews with key informants. Although it is premature to conclude that Qigong is another therapeutic modality in traditional Chinese medicine, it is also premature to rule out the possible therapeutic efficacy of Qigong, in particular, internal Qi. Even if medical Qigong is effective, the establishment and enforcement of standards of practice and codes of ethics amongst Qigong masters will remain unresolved as there has not yet been any effective way to assess the competence of a Qigong master. Although a number of control measures have been proposed in this paper, a better understanding of the educational, professional and ethical standards and efficacy of such a practice is required.
气功作为中医传统医疗手段越来越受欢迎。它可能对治疗疾病有效。然而,听到对这种治疗无效的抱怨并不罕见。本文试图通过文献综述和对关键信息提供者的访谈,审视中国近期将气功作为一种有效的保健形式进行推广以及对气功从业者的监管情况。虽然现在就得出气功是中医另一种治疗手段的结论还为时过早,但排除气功,尤其是内气可能的治疗功效也为时过早。即使医学气功有效,由于尚未有任何有效方法评估气功大师的能力,气功大师之间执业标准和道德规范的制定与执行仍未得到解决。尽管本文提出了一些控制措施,但仍需要更好地了解这种疗法的教育、专业和道德标准以及功效。