Suppr超能文献

[法尔氏试验中对克氏锥虫的间接免疫荧光法与免疫酶法筛查抗天然DNA自身抗体的比较]

[Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia luciliae of Farr test, and immunoenzymatic methods for the screening of anti-native DNA autoantibodies].

作者信息

Chrétien P, Dauvin M, Hélin P, Ocwieja T, Absalon Y B, Johanet C

机构信息

Laboratoire d'immunologie, centre hospitalier intercommunal, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1994;52(9):645-50.

PMID:7872513
Abstract

Anti-native DNA (ds DNA) antibodies were measured by the Farr assay, an indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia luciliae (IIFCL) and a newly commercialised enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Elisa) in the sera of 270 patients: 73 negative controls, 67 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 73 with clinical symptoms of another connective tissue disease and 61 patients with liver diseases. The Farr assay remains a reliable method, IIFCL seems to be as specific but less sensitive and Elisa has a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity. Finally, 35 sera from the 270 patients were tested for anti-ds DNA antibodies using two other commercialised Elisa-related techniques. The results suggest little correlation between the three Elisa methods.

摘要

采用Farr试验、利什曼原虫间接免疫荧光法(IIFCL)以及一种新商业化的酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),对270例患者血清中的抗天然DNA(双链DNA)抗体进行检测,这些患者包括73例阴性对照、67例系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者、73例有其他结缔组织病临床症状的患者以及61例肝病患者。Farr试验仍然是一种可靠的方法,IIFCL似乎同样具有特异性,但敏感性较低,而ELISA具有较高的敏感性,但特异性较低。最后,使用另外两种商业化的与ELISA相关的技术,对这270例患者中的35份血清进行了抗双链DNA抗体检测。结果表明这三种ELISA方法之间相关性很小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验