Allouche G, Joober R, Vanelle J M, Brochier T, Olié J P
Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Santé Mentale et de Thérapeutique, Paris.
Encephale. 1994 Nov-Dec;20(6):777-80.
Although clozapine (CLZ) is effective in resistant schizophrenia, it fails in some cases leading to a therapeutic problem. Authors report a case of schizophrenia which resists several neuroleptic trials (including haloperidol, chlorpromazine and thioproperazine) and responds to a sequence of CLZ and amisulpride. These two atypical neuroleptics have the same main target (mesolimbic system) but have different and complementary affinities to neuromediator receptors: CLZ has strong serotoninergic and anticholinergic action, noradrenergic alpha 1 affinity and moderately active dopaminergic antagonism; amisulpride has a high and specific dopaminergic D2 antagonism when used at high posology. This clinical improvement can be related to "second treatment effect", described by Goldman in 1966: his study included two groups of refractory schizophrenic patients who received successively during two 6 months periods, 2 neuroleptics (fluphenazine and trifluperazine). Without initial therapeutic response, he noted a significant improvement only after change of neuroleptic medication. Tricyclic antidepressants may turn to be effective, after an initial failure, when they are given after an uneffective ECT trial. The same model may be applied and the clozapine-amisulpride sequence is proposed as an alternative treatment in resistant schizophrenia: even if CLZ is uneffective, it may produce carryover effects which ease the action of amisulpride. The hypothesis of an action on 5HT2-D2 antagonism is advanced. It leads to the general question of the opportunity of neuroleptic sequential prescription in resistant schizophrenia as a therapeutic option.
