在日立737上对用于检测苯丙胺类药物的Abuscreen ONLINE检测法的评估：与EMIT和气相色谱/质谱联用方法的比较。
Evaluation of the Abuscreen ONLINE assay for amphetamines on the Hitachi 737: comparison with EMIT and GC/MS methods.
作者信息
Baker D P, Murphy M S, Shepp P F, Royo V R, Caldarone M E, Escoto B, Salamone S J
机构信息
Damon Reference Laboratories, Newbury Park, CA.
出版信息
J Forensic Sci. 1995 Jan;40(1):108-12.
The performance of the ONLINE Assay for Amphetamines on the Hitachi 737 was compared to the Syva Emit d.a.u. Assay and GC/MS. Randomly screened (n = 2964) patient urine samples were assayed using ONLINE and Emit d.a.u. assays concurrently, using d-amphetamine, 1000 ng/mL and d-methamphetamine, 1000 ng/mL as the screening cutoff for ONLINE and Emit d.a.u. assays, respectively. All presumptive positives were confirmed by GC/MS. The specificity was 99% (2937/2964) for ONLINE and 97% (2873/2964) for Emit. Agreement with GC/MS was 80% (110/137) for ONLINE and 55% (110/201) for Emit.
将日立737上的苯丙胺在线检测方法的性能与Syva Emit d.a.u.检测方法和气相色谱/质谱法进行了比较。使用在线检测方法和Emit d.a.u.检测方法同时对随机筛选的（n = 2964）患者尿液样本进行检测，分别将1000 ng/mL的d-苯丙胺和1000 ng/mL的d-甲基苯丙胺作为在线检测方法和Emit d.a.u.检测方法的筛查临界值。所有推定阳性样本均通过气相色谱/质谱法进行确认。在线检测方法的特异性为99%（2937/2964），Emit检测方法的特异性为97%（2873/2964）。在线检测方法与气相色谱/质谱法的一致性为80%（110/137），Emit检测方法与气相色谱/质谱法的一致性为55%（110/201）。
Zotero 插件