Clendenning M K, Wolfe H, Shuman L J, Huber G A
Med Care. 1976 Sep;14(9):751-64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197609000-00003.
This study was conducted to determine whether implementation of a specific formalized concurrent utilization review system which involved making a prior determination of length of stay had any more effect on average length of stay than continuance of a utilization review method not involving assignment of such a target date. The system studied was the Pre-Discharge Utilization Review (PDUR) program used for Medicaid patients in Pennsylvania. Analysis was conducted using discharge abstracts for Medicaid patients under age 65 who were discharged with one of 14 common diagnoses for certain Allegheny County hospitals in 1972 and 1973. Comparisons were made for each individual diagnosis to control for possible differences in case mix. Results indicate that there was no general reduction in length of stay which could be attributed to the PDUR program.
本研究旨在确定实施一种特定的正式同步利用审查系统(该系统涉及事先确定住院时间)是否比继续采用不涉及设定此类目标日期的利用审查方法对平均住院时间有更大影响。所研究的系统是宾夕法尼亚州用于医疗补助患者的出院前利用审查(PDUR)计划。分析使用了1972年和1973年阿勒格尼县某些医院65岁以下因14种常见诊断之一出院的医疗补助患者的出院摘要。针对每种单独诊断进行比较,以控制病例组合可能存在的差异。结果表明,住院时间没有普遍缩短,不能将其归因于PDUR计划。