Suppr超能文献

[使用多普勒导丝在体内评估冠状动脉狭窄严重程度:连续性方程是否适用于中度至重度冠状动脉狭窄?]

[Assessment of coronary stenosis severity using a Doppler guide wire in vivo: is the continuity equation applicable to moderate to severe coronary artery stenosis?].

作者信息

Hozumi T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, Shakudo M, Takagi T, Honda Y, Okura H

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kobe General Hospital.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 1995 Jan;25(1):1-7.

PMID:7877097
Abstract

The usefulness of a Doppler guide wire was evaluated in the estimation of coronary stenosis severity in patients with moderate to severe coronary stenosis using the continuity equation. The maximal coronary flow velocities (V) proximal to the stenosis (p), at the stenosis (s), and distal to the stenosis (d) were measured using a Doppler guide wire (12-MHz, 0.018-in) in 12 patients with mild coronary stenosis (less than 50% diameter stenosis: group A) and 12 patients with moderate to severe coronary stenosis (more than 50% diameter stenosis: group B). Percent diameter stenosis (%DS) was calculated from Vp/Vs by: %DS = (1 - square root of Vp/Vs) x 100 (%) (Vp = the maximal velocity proximal to the stenosis; Vs = the peak velocity at the stenotic site) Percent DS was calculated from Vd/Vs by: %DS = (1 - square root of Vd/Vs) x 100 (%) (Vd = the peak velocity distal to the stenosis) Regression of Doppler-derived %DS from Vp/Vs compared to quantitative coronary angiographic % DS were: Group A: y = 0.83x + 3.0 (r = 0.79), Group B: y = 0.63x + 9.4 (r = 0.81), Overall: y = 0.63x + 9.6 (r = 0.91) Regression of Doppler-derived %DS from Vd/Vs compared to quantitative coronary angiographic %DS were: Group A: y = 0.98x - 1.0 (r = 0.81), Group B: y = 0.67x + 14.6 (r = 0.84), Overall: y = 0.79x + 7.6 (r = 0.91) The continuity equation method using a Doppler guide wire underestimates coronary stenosis severity in patients with moderate to severe coronary stenosis, although Doppler-derived %DS is correlated with angiographic %DS.

摘要

使用连续性方程评估了多普勒导丝在估计中度至重度冠状动脉狭窄患者冠状动脉狭窄严重程度方面的实用性。在12例轻度冠状动脉狭窄(直径狭窄小于50%:A组)和12例中度至重度冠状动脉狭窄(直径狭窄大于50%:B组)患者中,使用多普勒导丝(12MHz,0.018英寸)测量狭窄近端(p)、狭窄处(s)和狭窄远端(d)的最大冠状动脉流速(V)。直径狭窄百分比(%DS)由Vp/Vs计算得出:%DS =(1 - √Vp/Vs)×100%(Vp =狭窄近端的最大流速;Vs =狭窄部位的峰值流速);直径狭窄百分比(%DS)由Vd/Vs计算得出:%DS =(1 - √Vd/Vs)×100%(Vd =狭窄远端的峰值流速)。与定量冠状动脉造影%DS相比,由Vp/Vs得出的多普勒衍生%DS的回归方程为:A组:y = 0.83x + 3.0(r = 0.79),B组:y = 0.63x + 9.4(r = ),总体:y = 0.63x + 9.6(r = 0.91);与定量冠状动脉造影%DS相比,由Vd/Vs得出的多普勒衍生%DS的回归方程为:A组:y = 0.98x - 1.0(r = 0.81),B组:y = 0.67x + 14.6(r = 0.84),总体:y = 0.79x + 7.6(r = 0.91)。尽管多普勒衍生的%DS与血管造影%DS相关,但使用多普勒导丝的连续性方程方法低估了中度至重度冠状动脉狭窄患者的冠状动脉狭窄严重程度。 (注:原文中B组的“r = ”处信息缺失)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验