Murphy J K, Alpert B S, Walker S S
Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Behav Med. 1994 Oct;17(5):501-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01857922.
Investigations suggesting that the order of obtaining resting and cardiovascular reactivity measurements moderates values have provided inconsistent results and have not analyzed data from children; the generalizability of results is uncertain. In this investigation, all children enrolled in the eighth-grade classrooms of the public schools of an entire county (n = 451) participated in standardized reactivity assessments. The order of resting and reactivity measurements was randomized by examination day (a total of 19 days). Analyses indicated that all comparisons of order effects on mean resting blood pressure and heart rate, as well as reactivity (both change from resting and absolute values and both mean and maximal values), were nonsignificant. Results indicate that measurement order is not always a necessary consideration in studies of reactivity; the conditions under which measurement order is a consideration requires clarification.
有关获取静息值和心血管反应性测量值的顺序会影响测量结果的研究得出了不一致的结果,且未对儿童数据进行分析;结果的普遍性尚不确定。在本研究中,某县所有公立学校八年级班级的所有儿童(n = 451)都参与了标准化反应性评估。静息测量和反应性测量的顺序在考试日(共19天)进行了随机安排。分析表明,测量顺序对平均静息血压、心率以及反应性(静息值的变化和绝对值,以及平均值和最大值)的所有比较均无显著意义。结果表明,在反应性研究中,测量顺序并非总是需要考虑的因素;需要明确测量顺序成为一个考虑因素的条件。