• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[情感状态下的杀人行为与责任问题]

[Homicide in affective states and the problem of responsibility].

作者信息

Tarnawski M

机构信息

Katedry Prawa Karnego Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 1995 Jan-Feb;29(1):25-32.

PMID:7878151
Abstract

The penal code dated April 19th 1969 allows for three privileged types of manslaughter: manslaughter under strong emotional disturbance (art. 148 sections 2), infanticide (art. 149) and euthanasia for request (art. 150). The first two types of manslaughter are the discussed the third one is neglected because only the general problems of soundness of mind, non-accountability and greatly diminished accountability (art. 25 penal code) refer to them. In the situation when strong emotional disturbance exists (so called physiologically conditioned emotional disturbance) from art. 148 sections 2 penal code and one of the mentioned states mentioned in art. 25 penal code (mental deficiency, mental disease, other mental disorders) results in greatly diminished accountability and the cumulative qualification from art. 148 sections 2 and art. 25 sections 2 penal code will be admissible. As far as infantcide is concerned, the following opinion has been expressed that physiologically proper childbirth does not cause disconnection or restriction of soundness of mind. But in the case of psychological disorders such possibility cannot be excluded. The author postulates a wide participation of experts in psychology and psychiatry in cases prosecuted under art. 148 sections 2 penal code and art. 149 penal code.

摘要

1969年4月19日的刑法典规定了三种特殊类型的过失杀人罪:因强烈情绪困扰导致的过失杀人(刑法典第148条第2款)、杀婴(刑法典第149条)和应请求的安乐死(刑法典第150条)。前两种过失杀人罪类型将被讨论,第三种则被忽视,因为只有精神健全、无刑事责任能力和刑事责任能力大幅降低(刑法典第25条)等一般问题涉及到它们。在存在刑法典第148条第2款所规定的强烈情绪困扰(所谓生理条件性情绪困扰)的情况下,且刑法典第25条所提及的上述状态(精神缺陷、精神疾病、其他精神障碍)之一导致刑事责任能力大幅降低时,刑法典第148条第2款和第25条第2款的累积定罪将被允许。就杀婴而言,有人表达了以下观点,即生理上正常的分娩不会导致精神健全的中断或受限。但在心理障碍的情况下,这种可能性不能排除。作者主张在根据刑法典第148条第2款和第149条提起诉讼的案件中,心理学和精神病学专家应广泛参与。

相似文献

1
[Homicide in affective states and the problem of responsibility].[情感状态下的杀人行为与责任问题]
Psychiatr Pol. 1995 Jan-Feb;29(1):25-32.
2
[Analysis of selected changes in project the penal code].
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2002 Jul-Sep;52(3):187-94.
3
[[Selected legal aspects related to medical practice].[与医疗实践相关的选定法律方面]
Folia Med Cracov. 1998;39(3-4):97-120.
4
[Qualification of persons taking part in psychiatric opinion-giving in a penal trial].[参与刑事审判中精神病学意见提供人员的资质]
Psychiatr Pol. 1998 Jul-Aug;32(4):397-403.
5
[New penal law from the point of forensic psychiatry and psychology].[从法医精神病学和心理学角度看新刑法]
Psychiatr Pol. 1998 Jul-Aug;32(4):383-96.
6
[Complex expertise on the psychiatric health of a criminal].[关于罪犯精神健康的复杂专业知识]
Psychiatr Pol. 2006 Jan-Feb;40(1):5-17.
7
[Depression and legal capacity to stand trial].[抑郁症与受审的法律行为能力]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2006 Jan-Mar;56(1):48-55.
8
Federal Act amending the Penal Code and the Code of Penal Procedure (Penal Code Amendments 1989), 27 April 1989.1989年4月27日修订《刑法典》和《刑事诉讼法典》的联邦法案(1989年刑法典修正案)
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:118, 544-5.
9
["Short-lived disease that is a real life hazard"].
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2002 Apr-Jun;52(2):121-5.
10
Recent changes in Criminal Procedure Code and Indian Penal Code relevant to medical profession.《刑事诉讼法》和《印度刑法典》中与医疗行业相关的近期变动。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2010 Feb;108(2):94, 103-4.