Suppr超能文献

囊性纤维化患者的胸部物理治疗管理。一项荟萃分析。

Chest physical therapy management of patients with cystic fibrosis. A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Thomas J, Cook D J, Brooks D

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Mar;151(3 Pt 1):846-50. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/151.3_Pt_1.846.

Abstract

The purpose of this overview is to quantitatively assess the conflicting body of literature concerning the efficacy of physical therapy modalities for clearing bronchial secretions in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The modalities examined included positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask, forced expiratory technique (FET), exercise (EX), autogenic drainage (AD), and standard physical therapy (STD), consisting of postural drainage, percussion, and vibration. Computerized searches of the MEDLINE and Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health databases were performed for the years from 1966 to 1993. The authors of relevant papers were contacted for unpublished information. Studies were considered relevant if they met the following criteria: randomized trials in patients with a definite diagnosis of CF; an intervention of any combination of PEP, FET, STD, AD, or EX; and an outcome of FEV1, sputum weight, or sputum clearance. A review of 456 citations yielded 65 potentially relevant trials and 8 review articles; of these, 35 met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the overview. These studies evaluated different combinations of physical therapy modalities; therefore, we performed seven separate meta-analyses comparing the independent techniques using the pooled effect size technique. Standard physical therapy resulted in a significantly greater sputum expectoration than no treatment (effect size of 0.61 SD units, p < 0.0001). The combination of standard therapy with EX with associated with a statistically significant increase in FEV1 over STD alone (effect size of 0.48 SD units, p = 0.04). No other differences between physical therapy modalities were found.

摘要

本综述的目的是定量评估关于物理治疗方法在治疗囊性纤维化(CF)患者时清除支气管分泌物疗效的相互矛盾的文献。所研究的方法包括呼气末正压(PEP)面罩、用力呼气技术(FET)、运动(EX)、自主引流(AD)以及由体位引流、叩击和振动组成的标准物理治疗(STD)。对1966年至1993年期间的MEDLINE以及护理与联合健康累积索引数据库进行了计算机检索。联系了相关论文的作者以获取未发表的信息。如果研究符合以下标准,则被视为相关研究:对明确诊断为CF的患者进行的随机试验;PEP、FET、STD、AD或EX的任何组合干预;以及第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、痰液重量或痰液清除率的结果。对456篇文献的综述产生了65项潜在相关试验和8篇综述文章;其中,35项符合纳入标准并被纳入综述。这些研究评估了物理治疗方法的不同组合;因此,我们使用合并效应量技术进行了七项单独的荟萃分析,比较独立技术。标准物理治疗比不治疗导致咳出的痰液显著更多(效应量为0.61标准差单位,p<0.0001)。标准治疗与EX的组合与单独使用STD相比,FEV1有统计学显著增加(效应量为0.48标准差单位,p = 0.04)。未发现物理治疗方法之间的其他差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验