Sharma A K, Mishra S K, Salila M, Ramesh V, Bal S
Department of Surgical Endocrinology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow.
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994 Oct;38(4):267-71.
Several therapeutic and investigative studies suggest the possibility of the role of lipid profile aberrations in the pathophysiology of cyclical mastalgia. This prospective study is aimed to look for such aberrations. Fifty-seven patients of benign breast disease were included in this study who were symptomatic for at least 6 months prior to presentation. Detailed serum lipid profile work up was performed on day 1, 15 and 25 of menstrual cycle. The patients with symptoms of maximal severity (or limited to) during leuteal phase of menstrual cycle were included in group I (n = 32). Those who had mastalgia, but did not have above mentioned cyclical variation, were included in group II (n = 25). Since noncyclical mastalgia is a group of heterogeneous disorders of varied etiology, the patients in group II were treated as controls. At day 25, there was an elevation in mean values of HDL-C (P = 0.03) and HDL-C/LDL-C ratio (P = 0.01), and reduction in TC/HDL-C ratio (P < 0.03), in group I. This has not been the case with group II patients. When the patients of mastalgia were treated with low fat dietary regimen, there was a significant difference in the responses of these two groups (P value < 0.0001). Based on the results of lipid profile study and dietary intervention, we conclude that cyclical mastalgia is an entity which is distinctly different from noncyclical mastalgia and needs a different therapeutic approach. Our data, both investigative and therapeutic, suggests that cyclical mastalgia may be a result of cyclical aberrations in lipid metabolism, and the physiological treatment in the form of an appropriate dietary regimen holds a considerable promise.
多项治疗性和调查性研究表明,血脂异常在周期性乳房疼痛的病理生理学中可能发挥作用。这项前瞻性研究旨在寻找此类异常情况。本研究纳入了57例良性乳腺疾病患者,这些患者在就诊前至少有6个月的症状。在月经周期的第1天、第15天和第25天进行了详细的血清血脂检查。月经周期黄体期症状最为严重(或仅限于此阶段)的患者被纳入第一组(n = 32)。那些有乳房疼痛但没有上述周期性变化的患者被纳入第二组(n = 25)。由于非周期性乳房疼痛是一组病因各异的异质性疾病,第二组患者被视为对照组。在第25天,第一组患者的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)平均值升高(P = 0.03),HDL-C/低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)比值升高(P = 0.01),总胆固醇(TC)/HDL-C比值降低(P < 0.03)。第二组患者则没有这种情况。当乳房疼痛患者采用低脂饮食方案治疗时,这两组患者的反应存在显著差异(P值 < 0.0001)。基于血脂研究和饮食干预的结果,我们得出结论,周期性乳房疼痛是一种与非周期性乳房疼痛明显不同的病症,需要不同的治疗方法。我们的研究和治疗数据表明,周期性乳房疼痛可能是脂质代谢周期性异常的结果,以适当饮食方案形式进行的生理治疗具有很大的前景。