Hotopf M, Wessely S, Noah N
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
J R Soc Med. 1995 Jan;88(1):31-3.
This paper aims to assess the reliability of Local Research Ethical Committees (LREC), using a genuine research proposal which was sent to six LRECs. The main outcome criteria were modifications demanded by committees and the degree of agreement between them. All but one of the committees demanded some change in the proposal. None of the committees asked for the same changes. Our conclusion is that LRECs are highly variable.
本文旨在通过向六个地方研究伦理委员会(LREC)发送一份真实的研究提案,评估其可靠性。主要结果标准是各委员会要求的修改内容以及它们之间的一致程度。除了一个委员会外,其他所有委员会都要求对提案进行一些修改。没有一个委员会提出相同的修改要求。我们的结论是,地方研究伦理委员会的差异很大。