Ann Intern Med. 1995 Apr 15;122(8):622-7.
Past efforts to reverse or limit the effects of acute stroke have been largely unsuccessful, in part because of the inability to evaluate and treat most patients soon after stroke onset. One important factor in the delay of treatment has been the nihilistic attitude of medical personnel, including physicians, toward the need to rapidly evaluate and treat patients with stroke. This is important for non-neurologists because most patients with stroke are cared for by internists, family physicians, and emergency physicians. We present the concept of emergency brain resuscitation as one method of galvanizing and motivating health professionals to take a more proactive and aggressive approach to treating the patient with acute stroke. Laboratory and clinical data support the potential efficacy of emergency brain resuscitation teams, which will use standard and experimental techniques to treat patients with stroke. A cost-benefit analysis suggests that emergency brain resuscitation may lower the costs associated with stroke by reducing length of hospital stay, disability, and lost wages. The formation of pilot programs is a logical first step toward evaluating and refining this concept.
过去为逆转或限制急性中风影响所做的努力大多未成功,部分原因是无法在中风发作后不久对大多数患者进行评估和治疗。治疗延迟的一个重要因素是包括医生在内的医务人员对迅速评估和治疗中风患者必要性的虚无主义态度。这对非神经科医生很重要,因为大多数中风患者由内科医生、家庭医生和急诊科医生照料。我们提出紧急脑复苏的概念,作为激励和促使卫生专业人员对急性中风患者采取更积极主动治疗方法的一种方式。实验室和临床数据支持紧急脑复苏团队的潜在疗效,该团队将使用标准和实验技术治疗中风患者。成本效益分析表明,紧急脑复苏可能通过缩短住院时间、减少残疾和降低工资损失来降低与中风相关的成本。开展试点项目是评估和完善这一概念的合理第一步。