• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全血细胞计数样本的可接受性。美国病理学家学会对703个实验室进行的Q-Probes研究。

Complete blood count specimen acceptability. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 703 laboratories.

作者信息

Jones B A, Meier F, Howanitz P J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Mich. 48236.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995 Mar;119(3):203-8.

PMID:7887772
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to determine the frequency and reasons for rejection of specimens submitted to the laboratory for complete blood count studies.

DESIGN AND SETTING

College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement study prospective recording of rejected complete blood count specimens and associated factors in 703 laboratories.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Percentage of submitted specimens rejected for testing.

RESULTS

Of 7,894,882 complete blood count specimens submitted for testing to the participating laboratories during the data collection period, 35,347 (0.45%) were rejected. The most frequent reason for rejection was a clotted specimen, which occurred about six times more frequently than the second most cited reason, insufficient specimen quantity. Compared with their respective frequency of use for specimen collection, significantly more rejected specimens were collected in microtubes than in other containers. Compared with the respective frequency with which they collect specimens, laboratory personnel had significantly fewer rejected specimens than the other personnel groups. The poorest performance was exhibited by other in-hospital nonlaboratory personnel. Hospital bedsize was also a significant performance factor; smaller hospitals demonstrated lower rejection percentages.

CONCLUSIONS

Specimen rejection should be monitored on a regular basis, identifying institution-specific factors that are associated with rejection. Monitoring of sufficient significant variables will help narrow the focus of corrective action. Action thresholds should be set sufficiently low to assure ongoing efforts toward improvement.

摘要

目的

确定提交至实验室进行全血细胞计数研究的标本被拒收的频率及原因。

设计与背景

美国病理学家学会的Q-Probes实验室质量改进研究,前瞻性记录703家实验室中被拒收的全血细胞计数标本及相关因素。

主要观察指标

提交的标本被拒收用于检测的百分比。

结果

在数据收集期间,提交至参与研究实验室进行检测的7,894,882份全血细胞计数标本中,有35,347份(0.45%)被拒收。最常见的拒收原因是标本凝血,其发生频率比第二常见原因标本量不足高出约6倍。与各自用于标本采集的频率相比,微管采集的被拒收标本明显多于其他容器采集的。与各自采集标本的频率相比,实验室人员的被拒收标本明显少于其他人员组。医院内其他非实验室人员的表现最差。医院病床规模也是一个重要的表现因素;规模较小的医院拒收百分比更低。

结论

应定期监测标本拒收情况,识别与拒收相关的机构特定因素。监测足够多的重要变量将有助于缩小纠正措施的关注范围。行动阈值应设定得足够低,以确保持续努力改进。

相似文献

1
Complete blood count specimen acceptability. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 703 laboratories.全血细胞计数样本的可接受性。美国病理学家学会对703个实验室进行的Q-Probes研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995 Mar;119(3):203-8.
2
Chemistry specimen acceptability: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 453 laboratories.化学检验样本的可接受性:美国病理学家学会对453家实验室的Q-Probes研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jan;121(1):19-26.
3
Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.机构间床边血糖监测项目特征、准确性表现及质量控制文件的比较:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes对226家小型医院床边血糖监测的研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Jun;122(6):495-502.
4
Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.外科病理报告的实验室内部及时性。美国病理学家学会两项关于活检和复杂标本的Q-Probes研究结果。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Mar;120(3):234-44.
5
Early morning blood collections: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 657 institutions.清晨采血:美国病理学家学会对657家机构的Q-Probes研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Oct;122(10):865-70.
6
Changes in emergency department turnaround time performance from 1990 to 1993. A comparison of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies.1990年至1993年急诊科周转时间表现的变化。两项美国病理学家学会Q-探针研究的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Oct;121(10):1031-41.
7
Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.乳腺X线引导下的乳房活检:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes对434家机构中临床医生期望以及标本处理和报告特征的研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jan;121(1):11-8.
8
Blood culture quality improvement: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study involving 909 institutions and 289 572 blood culture sets.血培养质量改进:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes研究,涉及909家机构和289572套血培养标本。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Nov;120(11):999-1002.
9
Blood culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study involving 640 institutions and 497134 specimens from adult patients.血培养污染:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes研究,涉及640家机构和497134例成年患者标本。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Mar;122(3):216-21.
10
Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals.手术活检诊断周转时间的机构间比较:美国病理学家学会对157家小医院的5384例手术活检进行的Q-Probes研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Nov;122(11):951-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood specimen rejection rate in clinical laboratory: A systematic review and meta-analysis.临床实验室血液标本拒收率:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Pract Lab Med. 2022 Dec 19;33:e00303. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00303. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Haematology specimen acceptability: a national survey in Chinese laboratories.血液学标本可接受性:中国实验室的全国性调查。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Oct 15;28(3):030704. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.030704.
3
Impact of Educational Activities in Reducing Pre-Analytical Laboratory Errors: A quality initiative.
教育活动对减少分析前实验室误差的影响:一项质量改进举措。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2017 Aug;17(3):e309-e313. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2017.17.03.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Customer satisfaction survey with clinical laboratory and phlebotomy services at a tertiary care unit level.三级医疗单位层面临床实验室及静脉穿刺采血服务的客户满意度调查
Ann Lab Med. 2014 Sep;34(5):380-5. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.380. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
K(3)EDTA Vacuum Tubes Validation for Routine Hematological Testing.用于常规血液学检测的K(3)乙二胺四乙酸真空采血管验证
ISRN Hematol. 2012;2012:875357. doi: 10.5402/2012/875357. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
6
A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices.一份经内容效度验证的用于评估自我报告的静脉采血操作的问卷。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jan 19;5:39. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-39.
7
Influence of a light meal on routine haematological tests.轻食对常规血液学检查的影响。
Blood Transfus. 2010 Apr;8(2):94-9. doi: 10.2450/2009.0142-09.
8
Errors in medicine and errors in laboratory medicine: what is the difference?医学中的错误与检验医学中的错误:有何区别?
Blood Transfus. 2010 Apr;8(2):79-81. doi: 10.2450/2010.0159-09.