• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布斯-杜克敌意量表荷兰语版(BDHI-D)的心理测量特征及效度

Psychometric characteristics and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (the BDHI-D).

作者信息

Lange A, Pahlich A, Sarucco M, Smits G, Dehghani B, Hanewald G

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 1995 Feb;33(2):223-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00043-j.

DOI:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00043-j
PMID:7887883
Abstract

Data are presented on the factorial structure, internal consistency, and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (the BDHI-D). Factor analyses of the responses of 463 subjects revealed two scales measuring Overt Aggression and Covert Aggression. The reliability of both subscales is good. Concordance with other self-report measures reveals satisfactory convergent and divergent validity.

摘要

文中呈现了关于布斯-杜克敌意量表荷兰语版(BDHI-D)的因子结构、内部一致性和效度的数据。对463名受试者的回答进行因子分析,结果显示有两个量表分别测量公开攻击和隐蔽攻击。两个分量表的信度良好。与其他自我报告测量方法的一致性显示出令人满意的聚合效度和区分效度。

相似文献

1
Psychometric characteristics and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (the BDHI-D).布斯-杜克敌意量表荷兰语版(BDHI-D)的心理测量特征及效度
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Feb;33(2):223-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00043-j.
2
Validation of the Dutch adaptation of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory.《巴斯-杜克敌意量表》荷兰语版本的效度验证
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Feb;33(2):229-33. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00044-k.
3
The validity of the BDHI translated into Papiamento in pre-trial defendants in Curaçao.BDHI 翻译成帕皮阿门托语在库拉索岛审前被告中的有效性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 May-Jun;88:101890. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101890. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Interictal aggression in epilepsy: the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory.癫痫发作间期的攻击行为:巴斯-杜克敌意量表
Epilepsia. 1994 May-Jun;35(3):585-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02478.x.
5
Reliability reporting across studies using the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory.使用布斯-杜克敌意量表的各项研究中的信度报告。
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Jan;24(1):20-37. doi: 10.1177/0886260508314931. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
6
[Depression and aggression. A control group study on the aggression hypothesis in depressive disorders based on the Buss-Durkee Questionnaire].[抑郁与攻击性。基于布斯-杜克问卷对抑郁症攻击性假说的对照组研究]
Psychiatr Prax. 1998 Sep;25(5):240-5.
7
Psychometric evaluation on the Japanese adaptation of the Aggression Questionnaire.《攻击问卷》日文版的心理测量学评估
Behav Res Ther. 2001 Jul;39(7):853-8. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00057-7.
8
Development of covert and overt hostility scales from the Buss-Durkee Inventory.基于巴斯-杜克敌意量表编制隐蔽和公开敌意量表。
Psychol Rep. 1990 Oct;67(2):671-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.2.671.
9
Obsessions and compulsions: dimensional structure, reliability, convergent and divergent validity of the Padua Inventory.
Behav Res Ther. 1992 Nov;30(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90008-5.
10
On the dimensionality of the Buss/Perry Aggression Questionnaire.论布斯/佩里攻击性问卷的维度
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jun;35(6):563-8. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00014-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Aripiprazole in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review.阿立哌唑治疗边缘型人格障碍的疗效和安全性:系统评价。
Psychiatr Q. 2023 Dec;94(4):541-557. doi: 10.1007/s11126-023-10045-8. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
Effect of virtual reality aggression prevention training for forensic psychiatric patients (VRAPT): study protocol of a multi-center RCT.虚拟现实攻击性预防训练对法医精神病患者的影响(VRAPT):一项多中心 RCT 的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1830-8.
3
Preliminary evidence for the construct and concurrent validity of the DS14 in Hebrew.
希伯来文版 DS14 结构效度和同时效度的初步证据。
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;19(2):234-40. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9147-8.
4
The Dula Dangerous Driving Index: an investigation of reliability and validity across cultures.杜拉危险驾驶指数:跨文化的信效度调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Mar;40(2):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.019. Epub 2007 Oct 8.