Suppr超能文献

[抑郁与攻击性。基于布斯-杜克问卷对抑郁症攻击性假说的对照组研究]

[Depression and aggression. A control group study on the aggression hypothesis in depressive disorders based on the Buss-Durkee Questionnaire].

作者信息

Wolfersdorf M, Kiefer A

机构信息

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Bezirkskrankenhaus Bayreuth.

出版信息

Psychiatr Prax. 1998 Sep;25(5):240-5.

PMID:9816604
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to prove the hypothesis that covert or inhibited aggression/hostility as described in psychoanalytic literature is part of the psychogenetic development of depression.

METHOD

We compared 50 consecutively admitted depressed inpatients to 50 healthy people of the regionally living general population, matched by sex and age, using the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory.

RESULTS

Depressed patients have significantly higher values in the BDHI subscales "total aggression", especially in irritability, negativism, resentment, suspicion and guilt, also in "attitudional component", "inhibited aggression" and "covert hostility". No differences were found in "assault" and "indirect aggression", controls got significantly higher values in "verbal aggression". A comparison of depressed patients with suicide attempts versus depressed patients without such behaviour showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

The psychoanalytic hypothesis seems to be useful for depression but not for the suicidal behaviour of depressive patients.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是验证如下假设,即精神分析文献中所描述的隐蔽或抑制性攻击/敌意是抑郁症心理发生发展的一部分。

方法

我们使用布斯-杜克敌意量表,将50名连续入院的抑郁症住院患者与50名来自当地普通人群、年龄和性别匹配的健康人进行比较。

结果

抑郁症患者在BDHI分量表“总体攻击”上得分显著更高,尤其是在易怒、消极、怨恨、猜疑和内疚方面,在“态度成分”、“抑制性攻击”和“隐蔽敌意”方面也是如此。在“攻击”和“间接攻击”方面未发现差异,对照组在“言语攻击”方面得分显著更高。对有自杀企图的抑郁症患者和无此类行为的抑郁症患者进行比较,未发现显著差异。

结论

精神分析假设似乎适用于抑郁症,但不适用于抑郁症患者的自杀行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验