Hermann L S, Scherstén B, Melander A
Department of Community Health Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.
Diabet Med. 1994 Dec;11(10):953-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00253.x.
The short-term (2-12 weeks) antihyperglycaemic efficacy of metformin (M), glibenclamide (G), and their primary combination (MG) was assessed in a double-blind study including 165 unselected patients with Type 2 diabetes. Patients with diet failure were randomized to M, G or MG. The dose was titrated with a fasting blood glucose concentration (FBG) of < 6.7 mmol l-1 as the target, using at most six dose levels, the first three comprising increasing monotherapy (M or G) or low-dose primary combination (MGL), and the second three add-on therapies (M/G and G/M) and primary combination therapy escalated to high dose (MGH). Success rates were higher on MGL than on monotherapy. The difference in achieving acceptable control (FBG < or = 7.8 mmol 1(-1)) was 70% versus 51% (95% confidence interval 3-36%, p = 0.032). When the drugs were combined, a slightly greater FBG reduction (p = 0.026) was observed, at lower dosage (p = 0.013). The response could not be predicted from body weight, but depended upon initial FBG (p = 0.019) and meal-stimulated C-peptide (p = 0.007). FBG declined progressively with increasing doses of metformin, whereas glibenclamide exerted most of its effect at low dose. Primary combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea may be clinically useful.
在一项双盲研究中,对165例未经挑选的2型糖尿病患者评估了二甲双胍(M)、格列本脲(G)及其主要组合(MG)的短期(2 - 12周)降糖疗效。饮食控制失败的患者被随机分为接受M、G或MG治疗。以空腹血糖浓度(FBG)< 6.7 mmol/l为目标进行剂量滴定,最多使用六个剂量水平,前三个包括递增的单一疗法(M或G)或低剂量主要组合(MGL),后三个为追加疗法(M/G和G/M)以及递增至高剂量的主要组合疗法(MGH)。MGL的成功率高于单一疗法。实现可接受控制(FBG≤7.8 mmol/l)的差异为70%对51%(95%置信区间3 - 36%,p = 0.032)。当药物联合使用时,在较低剂量下观察到FBG降低幅度稍大(p = 0.026)(p = 0.013)。无法根据体重预测反应,但取决于初始FBG(p = 0.019)和餐时刺激后的C肽(p = 0.007)。随着二甲双胍剂量增加,FBG逐渐下降,而格列本脲在低剂量时发挥大部分作用。二甲双胍与磺脲类药物的主要组合疗法可能具有临床应用价值。