Suppr超能文献

儿童哮喘治疗方法的差异。

Variations in the treatment of childhood asthma.

作者信息

Phin S, Oates R K

机构信息

Sydney University Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital, Camperdown, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1993 Nov 15;159(10):662-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb138080.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To survey the assessment and management of childhood asthma by paediatricians, general practitioners, and respiratory physicians, and compare these findings with the Australian and New Zealand Consensus Statement guidelines on asthma management in children.

SETTING AND DESIGN

A six-item postal questionnaire designed to cover assessment, management of acute and mild asthma, use of prophylaxis and methods of delivery of medication.

PARTICIPANTS

A random sample of 100 paediatricians, 300 general practitioners and 100 respiratory physicians.

RESULTS

Response rates were: paediatricians, 88%; general practitioners, 66%; and respiratory physicians 51%. There was agreement between all three groups in most aspects of asthma management. Deviations from the Consensus Statement guidelines included: between 38% and 49% not using oxygen as one of the first-line treatments for acute asthma; a higher use of orally administered beta 2-agonists by general practitioners (up to 40% for children between one and three years compared with 17% of paediatricians and 12% of respiratory physicians); a tendency to use intravenously administered aminophylline before corticosteroids (20% of paediatricians, 40% of general practitioners and 30% of respiratory physicians); a preference among general practitioners and respiratory physicians to prescribe inhaled corticosteroids rather than sodium cromoglycate for prophylaxis in older children; and a low incidence of use of spacer devices in older children.

CONCLUSIONS

If currently published recommendations on managing asthma in children are followed, there should be: more education and emphasis on the value of oxygen and short courses of orally administered corticosteroids in acute asthma management; less reliance on intravenously administered aminophylline; decreased use of orally administered beta 2-agonists coupled with a more wide-spread use of spacer devices; and an increased emphasis on sodium cromoglycate as first-line daily prophylaxis.

摘要

目的

调查儿科医生、全科医生及呼吸科医生对儿童哮喘的评估与管理情况,并将这些结果与澳大利亚和新西兰关于儿童哮喘管理的共识声明指南进行比较。

设置与设计

一份包含六个条目的邮政问卷,旨在涵盖评估、急性和轻度哮喘的管理、预防措施的使用及药物递送方法。

参与者

100名儿科医生、300名全科医生和100名呼吸科医生的随机样本。

结果

回复率分别为:儿科医生88%;全科医生66%;呼吸科医生51%。三组在哮喘管理的大多数方面达成了一致。与共识声明指南的偏差包括:38%至49%的人未将氧气作为急性哮喘的一线治疗方法之一;全科医生更多地使用口服β2受体激动剂(1至3岁儿童中高达40%,而儿科医生为17%,呼吸科医生为12%);在使用皮质类固醇之前倾向于使用静脉注射氨茶碱(20%的儿科医生、40%的全科医生和30%的呼吸科医生);全科医生和呼吸科医生在为大龄儿童预防用药时更倾向于开具吸入性皮质类固醇而非色甘酸钠;大龄儿童使用储雾罐的发生率较低。

结论

如果遵循目前发表的儿童哮喘管理建议,应:加强教育并更强调氧气在急性哮喘管理中的价值以及口服皮质类固醇的短期疗程;减少对静脉注射氨茶碱的依赖;减少口服β2受体激动剂的使用,同时更广泛地使用储雾罐;并更加强调色甘酸钠作为一线日常预防药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验