Monti P M, Rohsenow D J, Rubonis A V, Niaura R S, Sirota A D, Colby S M, Goddard P, Abrams D B
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Dec;61(6):1011-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.6.1011.
Although early investigations were promising, no controlled follow-up studies have investigated the effectiveness of cue exposure treatment for alcoholics. In this study, inpatient alcoholics received either cue exposure integrated with urge coping skills training (CET, n = 22) or a contrast condition (CC) involving daily contact with assessment only (n = 18) in addition to standard treatment. Comprehensive assessment measures were used to investigate change in process and outcome variables. In the second 3 months after treatment, the CET group included more patients who were completely abstinent, had a higher percentage of abstinent days, and tended to report fewer drinks per day than did patients in the contrast condition. The significantly greater use of coping skills during follow-up by the CET group and the significant relationship of these coping skills to decreased drinking suggest that treatment effects were due, at least in part, to the coping skills training, consistent with recent formulations. Theoretical and treatment implications are discussed.
尽管早期的调查很有前景,但尚无对照随访研究调查线索暴露疗法对酗酒者的有效性。在本研究中,住院酗酒者除接受标准治疗外,要么接受与冲动应对技能训练相结合的线索暴露疗法(CET组,n = 22),要么接受仅涉及每日评估接触的对照条件(CC组,n = 18)。采用综合评估措施来研究过程变量和结果变量的变化。在治疗后的第二个3个月里,CET组中完全戒酒的患者更多,戒酒天数的百分比更高,且与对照条件组的患者相比,每天报告的饮酒量往往更少。CET组在随访期间对应对技能的显著更多使用以及这些应对技能与饮酒减少之间的显著关系表明,治疗效果至少部分归因于应对技能训练,这与最近的理论阐述一致。本文讨论了其理论和治疗意义。