Suppr超能文献

药剂师对威斯康星医疗补助药品使用审查计划的反应。

Pharmacists' reactions to the Wisconsin Medicaid drug-use review program.

作者信息

Brown C M, Lipowski E E

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Health Care Administration, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993 Sep;50(9):1898-902.

PMID:7907839
Abstract

Pharmacists' reactions to inquiries on Medicaid drug-use review (DUR) and how the information supplied by such inquiries influenced pharmacists' interactions with physicians were studied. A questionnaire was mailed in September 1991 to all 137 pharmacies that had been contacted in 1989 by the Wisconsin Medicaid DUR program about potentially inappropriate use of histamine H2-receptor antagonists. The survey sought to determine whether pharmacists used information in the DUR letters and, if so, how. A section for consultants was included to identify possible differences in responses between consultant and nonconsultant pharmacists. A response was received from 96 of the 137 pharmacies contacted. Pharmacists reported that the issues raised by the DUR letter frequently were discussed with the prescriber. Most respondents attempted to make changes in drug therapy based on the information supplied in the DUR letter. Consultant pharmacists were less likely than nonconsultants to refer to the DUR letter but were more likely to consider inclusion of copies of references to the medical literature helpful, to contact the prescriber in writing, to discuss alternative therapies or discontinuation of therapy, and to suggest patient-monitoring activities. Although consultants and nonconsultants tend to use DUR information in different ways, DUR does offer helpful information that is used by Wisconsin pharmacists in making drug therapy recommendations to prescribers.

摘要

研究了药剂师对医疗补助药物使用审查(DUR)相关询问的反应,以及此类询问所提供的信息如何影响药剂师与医生的互动。1991年9月,向所有137家药房邮寄了一份调查问卷,这些药房在1989年曾被威斯康星州医疗补助DUR项目联系过,涉及组胺H2受体拮抗剂的潜在不当使用情况。该调查旨在确定药剂师是否使用了DUR信件中的信息,若使用了,是如何使用的。问卷中设有顾问部分,以确定顾问药剂师和非顾问药剂师在回答上可能存在的差异。在联系的137家药房中,有96家给予了回复。药剂师报告称,DUR信件中提出问题经常会与开处方者进行讨论。大多数受访者试图根据DUR信件中提供的信息对药物治疗做出改变。与非顾问药剂师相比,顾问药剂师提及DUR信件的可能性较小,但更有可能认为附上医学文献参考文献的副本会有所帮助,更有可能书面联系开处方者,讨论替代疗法或停止治疗,并建议进行患者监测活动。尽管顾问药剂师和非顾问药剂师倾向于以不同方式使用DUR信息,但DUR确实提供了有用信息,威斯康星州的药剂师在向开处方者提出药物治疗建议时会加以利用。

相似文献

6
Physicians' and pharmacists' perceptions on real-time drug utilization review system: a nationwide survey.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):634-641. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx085.
9
Identification of inappropriate drug prescribing by computerized, retrospective DUR screening in Korea.
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Nov;39(11):1918-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E674. Epub 2005 Oct 11.
10
On-line DUR messages: pharmacists' attitudes and actions in response.
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1997 May-Jun;NS37(3):315-20. doi: 10.1016/s1086-5802(16)30215-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验