• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物利用审查干预措施的评估:组胺拮抗剂的案例研究

Evaluation of a DUR intervention: a case study of histamine antagonists.

作者信息

Zimmerman D R, Collins T M, Lipowski E E, Sainfort F

机构信息

Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53705.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1994 Spring;31(1):89-101.

PMID:7909535
Abstract

Drug Utilization Review (DUR) programs aim to control inappropriate prescribing and drug costs, but there are few rigorous studies of their impact. This paper presents the evaluation results of a DUR intervention (excessive duration of full-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonists) using a quasi-experimental design. We observe a greater reduction of H2RA use in the intervention group than in the comparison group, and a reduction in drug expenditures which exceeded the cost of targeting and notifying prescribers. The success of DUR programs depends on both their efficiency and the drug issues under consideration; the use of a comparison group is critical in the evaluation of their impact.

摘要

药物利用审查(DUR)项目旨在控制不适当的处方行为和药物成本,但对其影响进行严格研究的却很少。本文采用准实验设计,呈现了一项DUR干预措施(全剂量组胺-2受体拮抗剂使用时间过长)的评估结果。我们观察到,干预组中H2RA的使用减少幅度大于对照组,且药物支出有所减少,这一减少幅度超过了针对和通知开处方者的成本。DUR项目的成功取决于其效率以及所考虑的药物问题;在评估其影响时,使用对照组至关重要。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a DUR intervention: a case study of histamine antagonists.药物利用审查干预措施的评估:组胺拮抗剂的案例研究
Inquiry. 1994 Spring;31(1):89-101.
2
A controlled letter intervention to change prescribing behavior: results of a dual-targeted approach.一项旨在改变处方行为的对照信函干预措施:双目标方法的结果
Health Serv Res. 1997 Oct;32(4):471-89.
3
Pharmacists' reactions to the Wisconsin Medicaid drug-use review program.药剂师对威斯康星医疗补助药品使用审查计划的反应。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993 Sep;50(9):1898-902.
4
Drug utilization review of sedative/hypnotic agents in Texas Medicaid patients. Texas Medicaid Vendor Drug Program Drug Utilization Review Board.德克萨斯州医疗补助患者镇静/催眠药物的药物利用审查。德克萨斯州医疗补助供应商药物计划药物利用审查委员会。
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Jul-Aug;40(4):495-9.
5
A practice-based approach for converting from proton pump inhibitors to less costly therapy.一种基于实践的从质子泵抑制剂转换为成本较低治疗方法的途径。
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;4(6):263-70.
6
Analysis of anti-epileptic drugs in fee-for-service Wisconsin Medicaid.
WMJ. 2006 Sep;105(6):36-9.
7
Drug education. Moving ahead the fourth year.药物教育。进入第四年。
Pa Med. 1997 Jan;100(1):22-4, 26.
8
Effect of drug utilization reviews on the quality of in-hospital prescribing: a quasi-experimental study.药物利用评估对住院处方质量的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Mar 14;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-33.
9
Effect of a retrospective drug utilization review on potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly.回顾性药物利用审查对老年人潜在不适当处方的影响。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Feb;7(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.02.004.
10
A qualitative study to explore influences on general practitioners' decisions to prescribe new drugs.一项探索影响全科医生新药处方决策因素的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Feb;53(487):120-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness and Economic Benefit of Continuous Professional Development for Drug Prescribing: A Systematic Review.药物处方持续专业发展的成本效益和经济效益:一项系统评价
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144973. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44973.
2
Comparing the Medicaid Retrospective Drug Utilization Review Program Cost-Savings Methods Used by State Agencies.比较各州机构使用的医疗补助回顾性药物利用审查计划成本节约方法。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Dec;10(9):477-482.
3
Evaluation results from prospective drug utilization review: Medicaid demonstrations.
前瞻性药物使用审查的评估结果:医疗补助示范项目
Health Care Financ Rev. 1999 Spring;20(3):107-18.
4
Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.改变医生的处方行为。
Pharm World Sci. 1999 Aug;21(4):158-67. doi: 10.1023/a:1008719129305.
5
Using feedback letters to influence the use of antiulcer agents in a Medicaid program.利用反馈信影响医疗补助计划中抗溃疡药物的使用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Mar;14(3):145-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00305.x.
6
Can restrictions on reimbursement for anti-ulcer drugs decrease Medicaid pharmacy costs without increasing hospitalizations?对抗溃疡药物报销的限制能否在不增加住院率的情况下降低医疗补助计划的药房成本?
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1593-610.
7
A controlled letter intervention to change prescribing behavior: results of a dual-targeted approach.一项旨在改变处方行为的对照信函干预措施:双目标方法的结果
Health Serv Res. 1997 Oct;32(4):471-89.