Seppälä H, Vuopio-Varkila J, Osterblad M, Jahkola M, Rummukainen M, Holm S E, Huovinen P
Antimicrobial Research Laboratory, National Public Health Institute, Turku, Finland.
J Infect Dis. 1994 Mar;169(3):519-25. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.3.519.
Serotyping is widely used for epidemiologic investigation of group A streptococci (GAS). To evaluate molecular typing methods of GAS, restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) of genomic DNA and analysis of DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism of rRNA genes (ribotyping) were used in parallel with serotyping. The genomic DNA of 239 epidemiologically unrelated GAS isolates from human invasive infections was digested with HindIII restriction enzyme. Both REA and ribotyping differentiated subclasses within serotypes. However, they did not consistently differentiate between isolates of different serotypes. Ribotyping was less discriminatory than REA. Within the T1M1 serotype, often associated with invasive GAS infections, 92% of the REA patterns were identical, suggesting a common origin for these isolates. Most other serotypes studied were more heterogenic. Among 32 isolates nontypeable by serotyping, 11 distinct REA patterns and 5 ribotypes were identified. REA and ribotyping are useful supplementary tools for classification of GAS and can add to the discriminatory power of serotyping.
血清分型广泛用于A群链球菌(GAS)的流行病学调查。为评估GAS的分子分型方法,将基因组DNA的限制性内切酶分析(REA)和rRNA基因的DNA限制性片段长度多态性分析(核糖体分型)与血清分型同时使用。用HindIII限制性内切酶消化了239株来自人类侵袭性感染的、在流行病学上无关联的GAS分离株的基因组DNA。REA和核糖体分型都能区分血清型内的亚类。然而,它们并不能始终区分不同血清型的分离株。核糖体分型的鉴别力不如REA。在通常与侵袭性GAS感染相关的T1M1血清型中,92%的REA模式相同,表明这些分离株有共同的起源。研究的大多数其他血清型更具异质性。在32株无法通过血清分型定型的分离株中,鉴定出11种不同的REA模式和5种核糖体分型。REA和核糖体分型是GAS分类的有用补充工具,可增强血清分型的鉴别力。