Seppälä H, He Q, Osterblad M, Huovinen P
Antimicrobial Research Laboratory, National Public Health Institute, Turku, Finland.
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Aug;32(8):1945-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.8.1945-1948.1994.
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was evaluated in comparison with restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) of genomic DNA and serotyping in the typing of 160 epidemiologically unrelated group A streptococci (GAS). Amplification of genomic DNA of GAS was performed with a single primer with an arbitrarily selected nucleotide sequence of 12 nucleotides. In total, 31 RAPD patterns and 15 REA patterns were observed among the isolates studied. The results of RAPD analysis were in accordance with the results of REA for 86% of the isolates, as both methods identified 15 different strains among 138 isolates. However, RAPD analysis differentiated 16 additional strains among 22 isolates. RAPD analysis was somewhat better than REA for differentiation of isolates of the same and different serotypes. However, not all of the serotypes were differentiated by RAPD analysis either. In conclusion, RAPD analysis provides a practical alternative for genomic typing of GAS. It can be recommended for the typing of GAS, especially if used in parallel with serotyping.
在对160株流行病学上无关联的A组链球菌(GAS)进行分型时,对随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)分析与基因组DNA的限制性内切酶分析(REA)及血清分型进行了比较评估。使用具有任意选定的12个核苷酸序列的单一引物对GAS的基因组DNA进行扩增。在所研究的分离株中,共观察到31种RAPD模式和15种REA模式。对于86%的分离株,RAPD分析结果与REA结果一致,因为两种方法在138株分离株中鉴定出15种不同菌株。然而,RAPD分析在22株分离株中又区分出16种额外的菌株。在区分相同和不同血清型的分离株方面,RAPD分析比REA稍好。然而,并非所有血清型都能通过RAPD分析区分开来。总之,RAPD分析为GAS的基因组分型提供了一种实用的替代方法。它可推荐用于GAS的分型,特别是与血清分型同时使用时。