• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A randomized prospective study of cefoxitin versus piperacillin in appendicectomy.

作者信息

Salam I M, Abu Galala K H, el Ashaal Y I, Chandran V P, Asham N N, Sim A J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 1994 Feb;26(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(94)90056-6.

DOI:10.1016/0195-6701(94)90056-6
PMID:7911147
Abstract

A randomized prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis using a single dose of either cefoxitin or piperacillin is presented. The trial was carried out in Al Ain Hospital in the period 1989-1992 on 250 adult patients with non-perforated appendicitis. One group (124 patients) received 2 g cefoxitin, the other group (126 patients) 2 g piperacillin. Antibiotics were administered intravenously in the operating theatre immediately before surgery. Wound infection occurred in three patients, 2.4% of the cefoxitin group and in five patients (4%) of the second group (with no significant difference). The commonest infecting organisms were Escherichia coli (5 out of 8). Mean hospital stay for patients with wound infection was 15 days (range 12-21) compared with 6 days, (range 4-8) for non-infected cases. Prophylactic cefoxitin or piperacillin were each therefore similarly effective in minimizing the rate of wound infections in patients with non-perforated appendicitis.

摘要

相似文献

1
A randomized prospective study of cefoxitin versus piperacillin in appendicectomy.
J Hosp Infect. 1994 Feb;26(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(94)90056-6.
2
Prophylaxis in appendicectomy with cefoxitin or ceftriaxone.
N Z Med J. 1988 Nov 23;101(858):781-3.
3
Single-dose cefotetan or cefoxitin versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute nonperforated appendicitis.单剂量头孢替坦或头孢西丁与多剂量头孢西丁用于急性非穿孔性阑尾炎阑尾切除术患者预防感染的比较
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):77-80.
4
Single-dose piperacillin versus cefoxitin combined with 10 percent mannitol bowel preparation as prophylaxis in elective colorectal operations.
Am J Surg. 1987 Nov;154(5):478-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90257-1.
5
Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute nonperforated appendicitis. The Danish Multicenter Study Group III.急性非穿孔性阑尾炎的抗生素预防。丹麦多中心研究组III。
Ann Surg. 1989 Mar;209(3):307-11. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198903000-00010.
6
A Danish multicenter study: cefoxitin versus ampicillin + metronidazole in perforated appendicitis.
Br J Surg. 1984 Feb;71(2):144-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710223.
7
[Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin in acute nonperforated appendicitis].[头孢西丁用于急性非穿孔性阑尾炎的抗生素预防]
Minerva Chir. 1994 Jan-Feb;49(1-2):55-8.
8
Metronidazole v. cefoxitin in severe appendicitis--a trial to compare a single intraoperative dose of two antibiotics given intravenously.甲硝唑与头孢西丁治疗重症阑尾炎的比较——一项比较术中单次静脉注射两种抗生素的试验
Postgrad Med J. 1983 Nov;59(697):720-3. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.59.697.720.
9
Prophylactic antibiotics in appendicectomy: a prospective double blind randomized study.阑尾切除术中预防性使用抗生素:一项前瞻性双盲随机研究。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1984 Dec;54(6):535-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1984.tb05442.x.
10
Cefoxitin versus gentamicin and metronidazole in prevention of post-appendicectomy sepsis: a randomized, prospective trial.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Nov;18(5):613-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.5.613.

引用本文的文献

1
Swedish national guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults and children.瑞典成人及儿童急性阑尾炎诊断与管理国家指南。
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae165.
2
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Abdominal Surgery for Neonates and Paediatrics: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.新生儿及小儿腹部手术中的外科抗菌药物预防:一项兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法共识研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;11(2):279. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020279.
3
Cost-effective prophylaxis of surgical infections.
具有成本效益的外科感染预防措施。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Aug;10(2):129-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610020-00005.