Suppr超能文献

充血性心力衰竭。药物治疗:中枢性还是外周性方法?

Congestive heart failure. Drug therapy: central or peripheral approach?

作者信息

Remme W J

机构信息

STICARES, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cardiologia. 1993 Dec;38(12 Suppl 1):51-9.

PMID:7912652
Abstract

Although prevention of heart failure recently has become a realistic issue, management of heart failure once the syndrome has developed, is mainly supportive, based on the various cardiac and peripheral changes which occur in the course of heart failure. Of these, abnormal neurohormonal activation is of major pathophysiologic and prognostic significance. Consequently, modulation of neuroendocrine activation is now recognized a prime target in the treatment of heart failure, besides diuretic therapy. In this respect, the value of converting enzyme inhibition is well established. Future developments in this area include dopaminergic agents, vasopressin antagonists, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, renin inhibitors, spironolactone and, possibly, ANF peptidase inhibitors. Besides diuretics, necessary when signs of fluid retention are present, the approach to heart failure management involves other pharmacologic issues. In view of abnormal vascular control with vasoconstriction prevailing during progressive heart failure, it clearly makes sense to vasodilate. However, of available vasodilators, only the combination of relatively high dose nitrates and hydralazine has proven to be of clinical significance, in terms of hemodynamics, exercise capacity and survival. It is possible, though, that novel generation dihydropyridine derivatives may prove beneficial as well. Thus far, there has been much debate concerning the usefulness and particularly the safety of positive inotrope therapy and inodilator treatment. Taken together, this concern relates to presence and predominance of cAMP-dependent mechanisms to induce these effects. Thus, sympathomimetic agents and phosphodiesterase inhibitors, such as milrinone or enoximone, are without beneficial effects, but instead shorten survival during long-term therapy. This may be different where compounds which act through cAMP-independent mechanisms, i.e., calcium sensitization or sodium channel stimulation, are concerned, but needs to be confirmed yet.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

尽管近期心力衰竭的预防已成为一个现实问题,但一旦该综合征发生,心力衰竭的管理主要是支持性的,基于心力衰竭过程中出现的各种心脏和外周变化。其中,异常的神经激素激活具有主要的病理生理和预后意义。因此,除利尿治疗外,调节神经内分泌激活现在被认为是心力衰竭治疗的主要靶点。在这方面,转换酶抑制的价值已得到充分证实。该领域未来的发展包括多巴胺能药物、血管加压素拮抗剂、血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂、肾素抑制剂、螺内酯,以及可能的心房钠尿肽肽酶抑制剂。除了在出现液体潴留迹象时必需的利尿剂外,心力衰竭的管理方法还涉及其他药理学问题。鉴于在进行性心力衰竭期间以血管收缩为主的异常血管控制,进行血管舒张显然是有意义的。然而,在现有的血管舒张剂中,就血流动力学、运动能力和生存率而言,只有相对高剂量的硝酸盐和肼屈嗪联合使用已被证明具有临床意义。不过,新一代二氢吡啶衍生物也可能被证明是有益的。到目前为止,关于正性肌力治疗和血管扩张性正性肌力药物治疗的有效性,尤其是安全性,一直存在很多争论。总的来说,这种担忧与诱导这些效应的cAMP依赖性机制的存在和主导有关。因此,拟交感神经药物和磷酸二酯酶抑制剂,如米力农或依诺昔酮,没有有益作用,反而会缩短长期治疗期间的生存期。对于通过cAMP非依赖性机制起作用的化合物,即钙致敏或钠通道刺激的化合物,情况可能有所不同,但仍有待证实。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验