Garand R, Béné M C
Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Faculté de Médecine de Nancy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Leuk Lymphoma. 1994;13 Suppl 1:1-5. doi: 10.3109/10428199409052664.
Several classifications of acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL) have been proposed as increasing numbers of technologies and reagents allowed to better characterize leukemic tumor cells. The French Groupe d'Etude Immunologique des Leucémies (GEIL) proposes an immunologic classification of ALL derived from this group's initial attempts and on proposals published by others. Its first step is based on a scoring system where individual markers are assigned major, intermediate and minor weights on a scale of respectively 1.5, 1 and 0.5 points. Assignment to a given lineage requires a score of at least 2 in this lineage. Thus are identified the four levels "null", "pure", "variant" and "multiphenotypic", depending on score combinations in the three B, T and myeloid lineages. In a second step, within each of these classes, cell differentiation criteria are applied to further identify 4 subclasses within PreB-ALL (PreB1 to PreB4) and 4 within T-ALL (T1 to T4). ALL with only myeloid markers are referred to as M0. This classification was applied to a series of 1014 scorable ALL. Pure ALL represented respectively 72% in children under 16, and 64% in adults, PreB ALL being significantly more frequent in the former (p < 0.01). B-ALL and T-ALL were significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent in adults (respectively 11% and 27%) than in children (7% and 20%). Null and M0 ALLs appeared significantly (p < 0.01) more frequent in adults (3.4 and 3.2%) than in children (1 and 0.3%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
随着越来越多的技术和试剂能够更好地对白血病肿瘤细胞进行特征描述,人们提出了几种急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的分类方法。法国白血病免疫研究小组(GEIL)基于该小组的初步尝试以及其他研究人员发表的提议,提出了ALL的免疫分类法。其第一步基于一个评分系统,在该系统中,各个标志物分别被赋予1.5、1和0.5分的主要、中等和次要权重。要归类到某一特定谱系,该谱系的得分至少要达到2分。因此,根据三个B、T和髓系谱系中的得分组合,可确定“无”“纯”“变异”和“多表型”四个水平。第二步,在这些类别中的每一类中,应用细胞分化标准进一步在PreB-ALL中识别出4个亚类(PreB1至PreB4),在T-ALL中识别出4个亚类(T1至T4)。仅具有髓系标志物的ALL被称为M0。该分类法应用于一系列1014例可评分的ALL。纯ALL在16岁以下儿童中占72%,在成人中占64%,PreB ALL在前一组中明显更常见(p<0.01)。B-ALL和T-ALL在成人中(分别为11%和27%)比在儿童中(7%和20%)明显更常见(p<0.05)。无和M0 ALL在成人中(分别为3.4%和3.2%)比在儿童中(1%和0.3%)明显更常见(p<0.01)。(摘要截断于250字)