Suppr超能文献

吲哚美辛单独使用或与胃保护剂丙谷胺联合使用时抗风湿活性及胃部副作用的双盲比较

Double-blind comparison of the antirheumatic activity and gastric side-effects of indomethacin used alone or in combination with a gastro-protective agent, proglumide.

作者信息

Pipitone V

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1976;4(4):267-77. doi: 10.1185/03007997609109317.

Abstract

A double-blind placebo controlled trial was carried out in 32 hospitalized patients with various rheumatic disorders to assess the therapeutic effectiveness and gastric tolerance of indomethacin (150 mg/day) used alone or in combination with proglumide (900 mg/day). Patients were treated for periods ranging from 20 to 28 days. The therapeutic response to both treatments, as assessed by objective criteria and final overall evaluation, was not significantly different. There was, however, a marked difference in gastric disturbance between the two groups. Uropepsinogen levels increased significantly during treatment in patients receiving indomethacin plus placebo but decreased significantly after Day 10 in those receiving proglumide. Although stomach X-ray or faecal occult blood investigations showed litle change from normal in either group, no gastric side-effects were reported in the proglumide patients whereas only 2 of the 16 patients receiving indomethacin plus placebo were entirely free of such side-effects throughout the trial, and most had developed gastric symptoms by the 9th day of treatment.

摘要

对32例患有各种风湿性疾病的住院患者进行了一项双盲安慰剂对照试验,以评估单独使用吲哚美辛(150毫克/天)或与丙谷胺(900毫克/天)联合使用时的治疗效果和胃耐受性。患者接受了20至28天不等的治疗。通过客观标准和最终总体评估,两种治疗方法的治疗反应无显著差异。然而,两组之间的胃部不适存在明显差异。接受吲哚美辛加安慰剂的患者在治疗期间尿胃蛋白酶原水平显著升高,而接受丙谷胺的患者在第10天后显著下降。尽管两组的胃X光或粪便潜血检查结果与正常情况相比变化不大,但丙谷胺组未报告有胃部副作用,而在接受吲哚美辛加安慰剂的16例患者中,只有2例在整个试验过程中完全没有此类副作用,大多数患者在治疗第9天时出现了胃部症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验