Laufer B Z, Baharav H, Cardash H S
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Int J Prosthodont. 1994 May-Jun;7(3):247-52.
This study compared the dimensional accuracy of impressions and dies made from a metal model simulating prepared abutments and having gingival sulci of varying widths. Measurements of the abutments, impressions, and stone dies were made using a travelling microscope, and the number of defects in each impression was recorded. The impressions and dies made from abutments with narrower sulci showed greater distortions. Analysis of variance and the Fisher PLSD post hoc test indicated significant differences between the group having a sulcular width of 0.08 mm and the groups having larger sulcular widths for the impressions and for the dies (P < .05). The large coefficient of variation occurring groups having 0.08-, 0.13-, and 0.18-mm sulcular widths demonstrated the difficulty of consistently obtaining good impressions of abutments having such narrow sulcular widths. Between 50% and 90% of abutment impressions having sulcular widths of 0.08 and 0.13 mm had defects.
本研究比较了由模拟预备基牙且具有不同宽度龈沟的金属模型制作的印模和模型的尺寸精度。使用移动显微镜对基牙、印模和石膏模型进行测量,并记录每个印模中的缺陷数量。由龈沟较窄的基牙制作的印模和模型显示出更大的变形。方差分析和Fisher PLSD事后检验表明,龈沟宽度为0.08 mm的组与龈沟宽度较大的组在印模和模型方面存在显著差异(P <.05)。龈沟宽度为0.08、0.13和0.18 mm的组出现的较大变异系数表明,对于龈沟宽度如此窄的基牙,始终获得良好印模存在困难。龈沟宽度为0.08和0.13 mm的基牙印模中有50%至90%存在缺陷。