Bonk H J
Richter am Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Berlin.
Blutalkohol. 1994 Jul;31(4):238-48.
Overall it can be said that legal questions concerning the interaction of administrative and criminal legal proceedings, and decisions regarding the withdrawal of driving licences according to sections 4 StVG, 69 StGB, have as a norm, been solved. However, the binding effects of decisions dealt with by administrative offices and administrative courts regarding fines, are limited. This is due to the fact that the conditions for the withdrawal of driving licences as a criminal offence according to section 69 StGB do not coincide with those conditions for the administrative offices according to section 4 StVG. In this respect, opposing decisions in both legal proceedings can not be totally ruled out, and are possible, at least in certain cases. In some cases, irrespective of the outcome of the legal proceedings, this can be unsatisfactory for reasons of certainty about one's legal position. But due to the dual jurisdiction of the withdrawal of driving licences by criminal offices and criminal courts on the one hand, and administrative courts on the other hand, it is calculated normatively.
总体而言,可以说关于行政和刑事法律程序相互作用的法律问题,以及根据《道路交通法》第4条、《刑法典》第69条作出的吊销驾驶执照的决定,通常已经得到解决。然而,行政机关和行政法院作出的关于罚款决定的约束力是有限的。这是因为根据《刑法典》第69条作为刑事犯罪吊销驾驶执照的条件与根据《道路交通法》第4条行政机关的条件不一致。在这方面,不能完全排除两个法律程序中出现相反决定的情况,而且至少在某些情况下是可能的。在某些情况下,无论法律程序的结果如何,由于对自身法律地位的确定性,这可能会令人不满意。但由于刑事机关和刑事法院与行政法院在吊销驾驶执照方面的双重管辖权,这在规范上是经过考量的。