• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处的胰腺移植结果,并与国际登记处的非美国数据进行比较。

Pancreas transplant results in United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) United States of America (USA) Registry with a comparison to non-USA data in the International Registry.

作者信息

Sutherland D E, Moudry-Munns K, Gruessner A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Clin Transpl. 1993:47-69.

PMID:7918182
Abstract

As of 1993, more than 5,000 pancreas transplants were reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. More than 3,600 were performed in the USA, including 3,000 since the inception of the UNOS Registry in October, 1987. The BD technique was used for 96% of USA cases but for only 63% of non-USA cases. In the overall analysis of USA BD cadaveric pancreas transplants reported to the Registry by November 1993 (n = 2,464), patient survival and pancreas graft function survival rates at one year were 91% and 72%, respectively, 87% and 67% at 2 years, and 84% and 62% at 3 years. When the USA data for BD cases were analyzed according to the 3 major recipient categories (simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants [SPK] [n = 2,112]; pancreas after kidney transplants [PAK] [n = 205]; and pancreas transplants alone [PTA] [n = 147]), patient survival rates were no different (91%, 92%, and 91% at one year, respectively), but pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher in the SPK than in the PAK and PTA categories (76%, 47%, and 48%, at one year, respectively). In the SPK group, kidney graft survival rates at one year were 85%. Although the overall results were not as good for non-USA as for USA pancreas transplants, this was probably because the results with non-BD techniques were not as good as when BD was used, and in Europe more than one-third of the cases used techniques other than BD. The patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival rates for BD SPK transplants in Europe (n = 522) and other non-USA locations (n = 64) were similar to those in the USA: in Europe 93%, 77%, and 84%, respectively, at one year. The graft survival rates for solitary pancreas transplants, however, were higher in the USA. Outcomes were also compared according to whether induction immunotherapy in USA recipients included ALG/ATG, OKT3, or neither. In the SPK category, there was no difference among the protocols: one-year graft survival rates were 76% with ALG/ATG (n = 1,141), 78% with OKT3 (n = 673), and 71% with neither (n = 249). In the PAK category, the use of OKT3 (n = 37) was associated with lower graft survival rates than when ALG/ATG (n = 133) or neither (n = 34) were given: 26%, 58%, and 53% at one year, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

截至1993年,国际胰腺移植登记处报告的胰腺移植超过5000例。美国进行了3600多例,其中自1987年10月美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处成立以来有3000例。在美国96%的病例使用了布罗德尔(BD)技术,而在非美国病例中仅为63%。在对1993年11月前向登记处报告的美国BD尸体胰腺移植(n = 2464)进行的总体分析中,患者1年生存率和胰腺移植物功能生存率分别为91%和72%,2年时为87%和67%,3年时为84%和62%。当根据3个主要受者类别(同时进行胰腺/肾脏移植[SPK][n = 2112];肾移植后胰腺移植[PAK][n = 205];以及单独胰腺移植[PTA][n = 147])对美国BD病例数据进行分析时,患者生存率无差异(1年时分别为91%、92%和91%),但SPK组的胰腺移植物生存率显著高于PAK组和PTA组(1年时分别为76%、47%和48%)。在SPK组中,肾移植物1年生存率为85%。虽然非美国的总体结果不如美国胰腺移植的结果好,但这可能是因为非BD技术的结果不如使用BD技术时好,而且在欧洲超过三分之一的病例使用了BD以外的技术。欧洲(n = 522)和其他非美国地区(n = 64)BD SPK移植的患者、胰腺和肾移植物生存率与美国相似:欧洲1年时分别为93%、77%和84%。然而,单独胰腺移植的移植物生存率在美国更高。还根据美国受者诱导免疫治疗是否包括抗淋巴细胞球蛋白(ALG)/抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)、OKT3或两者都不包括来比较结果。在SPK类别中,各方案之间无差异:使用ALG/ATG(n = 1141)时1年移植物生存率为76%,使用OKT3(n = 673)时为78%,两者都不使用(n = 249)时为71%。在PAK类别中,使用OKT3(n = 37)与使用ALG/ATG(n = 133)或两者都不使用(n = 34)相比,移植物生存率较低:1年时分别为26%、58%和53%。(摘要截短于400字)

相似文献

1
Pancreas transplant results in United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) United States of America (USA) Registry with a comparison to non-USA data in the International Registry.美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处的胰腺移植结果,并与国际登记处的非美国数据进行比较。
Clin Transpl. 1993:47-69.
2
Pancreas transplant results in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) United States of America (USA) Registry compared with non-USA data in the International Registry.美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处中胰腺移植的结果与国际登记处的非美国数据相比较。
Clin Transpl. 1994:47-68.
3
Pancreas transplantation in the United States (US) and non-US as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及其他国家的胰腺移植情况。
Clin Transpl. 1996:47-67.
4
Pancreas transplantation in the United States as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and analyzed by the International Pancreas Transplant Registry.向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告并经国际胰腺移植登记处分析的美国胰腺移植情况。
Clin Transpl. 1995:49-67.
5
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of October 2002.截至2002年10月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及非美国病例的胰腺移植结果。
Clin Transpl. 2002:41-77.
6
Analysis of United States (US) and non-US pancreas transplants as reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) and to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS).向国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)和器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告的美国及非美国胰腺移植情况分析。
Clin Transpl. 1998:53-73.
7
Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) United States of America (USA) Pancreas Transplant Registry data according to multiple variables.根据多个变量对美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)胰腺移植登记处的数据进行分析。
Clin Transpl. 1992:45-59.
8
Analyses of pancreas transplant outcomes for United States cases reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and non-US cases reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).对向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告的美国胰腺移植病例以及向国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的非美国病例的胰腺移植结果分析。
Clin Transpl. 1999:51-69.
9
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and non-US cases reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of October, 2000.截至2000年10月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告的美国胰腺移植病例以及向国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的非美国胰腺移植病例的结果。
Clin Transpl. 2000:45-72.
10
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of May 2003.截至2003年5月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及非美国病例的胰腺移植结果。
Clin Transpl. 2003:21-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Exocrine drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation in the new millennium.新千年血管化胰腺移植中的外分泌引流
World J Transplant. 2016 Jun 24;6(2):255-71. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255.
2
Success and complications of pancreatic transplantation at one institution.某机构胰腺移植的成功与并发症
Ann Surg. 1996 Jun;223(6):757-62; discussion 762-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199606000-00014.
3
Pancreas transplantation.胰腺移植
Int J Pancreatol. 1995 Feb;17(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02788353.