Fahle M, Henke-Fahle S, Harris J
University Eye Clinic, Tübingen, Germany.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Jul;78(7):572-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.7.572.
In the laboratory, thresholds for stereoscopic depth perception are usually determined by asking observers to discriminate between a stimulus with a given depth offset and its mirror image. Threshold is most often defined as the disparity difference that yields 75% or 83% correct responses. Disparities used for clinical tests of stereopsis are much higher. Here it is argued that, among other factors, this is because of the fact that clinical tests usually require the detection of a depth difference (offset versus no offset), rather than the discrimination between two directions of depth difference (in front versus behind). From a formal comparison of the two tasks, the data show that discrimination, or classification is easier by at least a factor of 2 than detection. The contribution of variations of the threshold criterion and learning to the differences between stereoacuity as measured in laboratory and clinic is also discussed. These differences are relevant to the design of tests for clinical use.
在实验室中,立体深度知觉的阈值通常是通过要求观察者区分具有给定深度偏移的刺激及其镜像来确定的。阈值最常被定义为产生75%或83%正确反应的视差差异。用于立体视临床测试的视差要高得多。本文认为,除其他因素外,这是因为临床测试通常需要检测深度差异(有偏移与无偏移),而不是区分深度差异的两个方向(在前面与在后面)。从这两项任务的形式比较来看,数据表明,辨别或分类至少比检测容易两倍。还讨论了阈值标准的变化和学习对实验室和临床测量的立体视敏度差异的影响。这些差异与临床使用测试的设计相关。