Kutay O, Bilgin T, Sakar O, Beyli M
Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1994 Mar;2(3):123-6.
Bonding of different soft lining materials has been widely investigated, but there is little work on the effect of using different denture base resins. This study investigates the bonding of Molloplast-B (a heat-cured, silicone soft lining material) and five commercial acrylic denture base materials of different types (Pacton, Lucitone, Meliodent, Ivocap and Compresin). The lining was processed against all the resins cured and Pacton, Lucitone and Meliodent uncured. In the cured specimens, Lucitone, Meliodent and Compresin demonstrated cohesive failure, whereas Pacton and Ivocap demonstrated part-adhesive and part-cohesive failure. All three sets of uncured specimens demonstrated adhesive failure. It was concluded that pre-curing, roughening and treating with Primo adhesive gives a better bond.
不同软衬材料的粘结已得到广泛研究，但关于使用不同义齿基托树脂的效果的研究却很少。本研究调查了Molloplast-B（一种热固化硅橡胶软衬材料）与五种不同类型的商用丙烯酸义齿基托材料（Pacton、Lucitone、Meliodent、Ivocap和Compresin）之间的粘结情况。将衬里材料分别与所有固化后的树脂以及未固化的Pacton、Lucitone和Meliodent进行加工处理。在固化标本中，Lucitone、Meliodent和Compresin表现出内聚破坏，而Pacton和Ivocap表现出部分粘结和部分内聚破坏。所有三组未固化标本均表现出粘结破坏。得出的结论是，预固化、粗糙化处理并用Primo粘合剂处理可获得更好的粘结效果。
